What is wrong with gravedigging Flood?

[n00bl3t]

It's Flood.

It's +0, were you expecting coherent discussion?

Why moderate it?

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Texas Red]

Trigger happy mods with nothing better to do? I dont know. I dont see a point unless it genuinely violates a rule, or is somewhat offensive.

[nOmnomnOm]

I also dont see the point in locking threads that the OP "gravedigs" himself .
And then the mod tells the owner to make a new one that is the exact same.

No point.

---

[sindroms]

It's Flood.

It's +0, were you expecting coherent discussion?

Why moderate it?

The same reason why we roll our eyes whenever someone says that 84 was better.
Stop living in the past.

---

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------

[pillow]

"Trigger-happy mods with nothing better to do."

Would've quoted, but I'm on my phone and can't be arsed.

[The Savage]

I am against enforcing gravedigging rule in certain cases, because sometimes there's no point in creating new topic, if thing can be asked/poked/reminded in the topic about very same thing.

[Lythrilux]

Mods need to fill their locking quota, otherwise they'll never make the finals and get put into the admin team.

---

[Doria]

pfff, noobs

[Karst]

The gravedigging rule is complete nonsense anyway.
There's no reason to prohibit it unless a topic is genuinely outdated by new information.

And in Flood?

Trigger happy mods with nothing better to do?

---

[n00bl3t]

It's Flood.

It's +0, were you expecting coherent discussion?

Why moderate it?

The same reason why we roll our eyes whenever someone says that 84 was better.
Stop living in the past.

This is one of the weirdest non sequiturs I've been exposed to.

Not that reminiscing about the past is bad or good inherently, but why does this mean threads should be locked?

It's flood and assuming no rules are broken, the whole thing is a waste of space. Does it matter who posts what down there?