Is it time to nerf cruise disruptors?

[Tenacity]

So many triggered people

---

[Lucas]

-snip-

That's why cloak disruptors exist, not CRUISE disruptors.

Otherwise I agree

Thing is, you have to either pay a good chunk of change to get said cloak disruptor. Cruise Disruptors are cheap and easy to replace. Maybe we should rename Cruise Disruptors to just Disruptors, and be done with it.

On the topic of cloak disruptors. How many of you actually own more than one, or have viable access to more?

Never mind their current price, just the amount of time they take to make has led to them being rare. Almost all the groups that can reliably field a cloak disruptor have a pob that makes them, and even then its not a common item, usually reserved for shared ships if its needed.

Removing the ability to prevent a ship from cloaking with a CD is a bad idea because then you'll have all manner of ships able to reposition and resupply without threat due to being able to cloak without counter in majority of situations.

Sean is again, correct. I personally only own one cloak disruptor, which was quite useful yesterday.

You also pay money to get a cloak, both are built from PoB's not only one. So it's a fair concept, and using a cloak means giving up your CM.
But we are getting away from the topic of this thread

[Zeb]

This is idea is bad, has been attempted before, and was reverted because it was terrible.

[Thyrzul]

Just a heads up, the moment discussions like this end up in a "don't fix what's not broken" vs "don't be afraid of changes" or "the current meta is too convenient for you" vs "you are just bad at the current meta", that's the moment the discussion ceases to be a constructive and objective one, and ends up in a clash of opinions and emotions.

Alright, kids, now you can continue with the drama, let the show go on.

---

[Kauket]

Stop ninjaing me.

Take a break boys.

---