To: Fabian Montluc (MAE) | From: PN | CC: MNG, OCI

[Nightowl]

Greetings to Mr. Fabian Montluc,

in your communication with the Parisian Assembly, mention cases of corruption in the realms of the Gendamerie.
Of course, we will investigate such cases and are interested in clarifying any corruption cases. We are also working very closely with the OCI to remove any royalists from the Gendamerie ranks.
If you call the Gendamerie corrupt at the Parisian Assembly, you are sure to have at least references to the officials involved. Of course, we would be very interested in this evidence so that we can fight corruption in our ranks.

Thank you for your cooperation and of course your details will be treated confidentially.

Sincerely,
Jean Bart III,
Inspecteur Général Police Nationale

---

---

---

This is a game, a Roleplay-Game!

[Monsieur Baguette]

Fabian Montluc

---

Monsieur Bart the Third,

The situation with the corrupt Gendarmeir does not concern MAE anymore as we are leaving Gallia and have no plans on returning any time soon. If you would like to inquire about our experience with corrupt Gendarmerie, I would direct you to this news item. Ad hoc interpretation of the non existing laws and extortion later on is easily identified as corruption.

It is sad we have to leave, MAE had plans to invide Gendarmerie to cooperation as Baronial Gendarmerie in Languedoc and cover all the financing issues. This will not come to fruition any more.

I wish you good fortune in the future and luck in extermination of corruption among your ranks.

Cordialment,
Baron Fabian Montluc

[Nightowl]

Greetings to Mr. Fabian Montluc,

so you conclude from this case that corruption would be widespread in the PN?
That is interesting. Do you have any further evidence? Other facts? Or just propaganda?
The fact is that your employee had truths with them that are prohibited in all civilized laws. And the idea that something is allowed just because it is not prohibited is an attitude for the courtroom. And our gendarmes are not judges or lawyers.
In addition, your employee would have had the option to contact the PN directly or a court if he / she felt he had been treated unfairly.
Since your employee did not seem to know about this option. So now you feel informed about the fact. Of course, this option is still open.

I therefore ask you to publish a clarification in your media, because otherwise we will bring this case to an ordinary court and have the Uxeau News Network charged with defamation. And even if you believe this, it is not about extra-atmosphere, but about criminal law. After all, the laws for taxes are not part of the Gallic Laws: Extra-Atmosphérique.
And even if you and none of your employees ever want to go back to Gallia, you certainly won't want us to send any criminal records to other Sirius houses.

Sincerely,
Jean Bart III,
Inspecteur Général Police Nationale

---

---

---

This is a game, a Roleplay-Game!

[Monsieur Baguette]

Fabian Montluc

---

Monsieur Bart the Third,

I was of higher opinion of your comprehension ability. You see, I and my employees are no longer Gallic citizens, we are out of Gallic jurisdiction, so you can bring rain and fire upon us in Gallia for all we care. You can try to contact other houses regarding this "defamation" case, you will only pose yourself fool to engage yourself in diplomacy over such a trifle.

In addition, a single case is still a case. We did not trust the court of Confederation, and for a good reason as you saw from the political predicament that followed. There could be no justice in the court room, so the best remedy is publicity. If one is informed, one is equipped to deal with similar situations in the future. We warned other citizens of Languedoc and Gallia of the misdeeds of your employees and did rightfully so. Besides, if you as a Law Enforcement Officer are not familiar with the term "defamation" is is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. Mind, that the information was not faulty - the incident reported did happen. Secondly, there was no malice in spreading that information - we actually did well to inform the others. With this argumentation you cannot make a proper case in the court. But yet again, we are no longer in Gallia and therefore no case can even be possible.

I advise you then to stop fighting the windmills and get to business to show in practice to the citizens of Gallia that we were wrong. Otherwise, you will just reinforce our claims.

Cordialment,
Baron Fabian Montluc