• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Official Player Factions Bretonia Bretonian Government Channel Bretonian Government Feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (13): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 13 Next »
Bretonian Government Feedback
Offline Sombs
12-10-2022, 02:18 AM,
#31
Naughty Catto
Posts: 6,779
Threads: 501
Joined: Feb 2014

I mean, if the owner didn't bother to somehow respond to BretGov for a week or didn't even log into the game for the time frame and didn't take notice about the base getting removed, Bretonia is just as dead now as it was one week before, except for people having been able to shoot at Bretonian siege ships.

Space Tamagochi is fun, but you can't pick only the fun parts of the game and ignore stuff like doing the absolute minimum of responding to an RP comm. The moment you build a destructible base in Discovery, you sorta have to keep in mind that it is, uh, destructible. Hell, a few years ago people paid both the lawfuls for protection and the unlawfuls for not getting sieged.

It's really not Darius' job to wait months for someone to potentially respond or not. It's actually the job of the PoB owner to take care of the PoB, both ingame and forum-wise, simply to prevent situations like these.




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions

Alternative Soundtracks


Reply  
Offline Lemon
12-10-2022, 02:26 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-10-2022, 02:28 AM by Lemon.)
#32
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,359
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

What .... situations? Show me precedents for this when your own gov sieges licensed bases at 85%+ after just a week after contacting them with 0 buildups and no law articles. Bases that were on for many years. I won't say much if it were unlawfuls, but this was their own gov!
Reply  
Offline Sombs
12-10-2022, 02:51 AM,
#33
Naughty Catto
Posts: 6,779
Threads: 501
Joined: Feb 2014

Looks to me like 4.8 is enough for Bretonia to make a demand and have BAF/BPA enforce it. Funny how RP is requested when it is convenient. [Image: 1027673364040532070.webp?size=96&quality=lossless]




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions

Alternative Soundtracks


Reply  
Offline St.Denis
12-10-2022, 03:42 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 100,599
Threads: 1,347
Joined: Dec 2011

This is a Feedback Thead.

It isn't a Petty Argument Thread.

'I would like to be half as clever as some people like to believe they are'
Life is full of disappointments, it is how we handle them that helps to define us, as a person
Reply  
Offline Stewgar
12-10-2022, 04:21 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 567
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2013

Individual players not role playing properly is one thing, but a government not obeying it's own laws and destroying licensed POBs is just sad.

Make new laws, increase the fee to obtain/renew licenses, impose reasonable restrictions on how far a POB can degrade before the military can make boom are just a few examples of what could be done to properly address the problem of space trash. I agree that there is a problem of too many abandoned POBs floating around. This, however, is not the correct course of action.

Unfortunately, the toxics chased away a dev that had a fix for this problem. But I'll just shut up and color.

It ain't about what you are capable of, it's about what you're willing to do.
Reply  
Offline Lemon
12-10-2022, 05:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-10-2022, 05:30 PM by Lemon.)
#36
The Legendary Lemon
Posts: 2,359
Threads: 114
Joined: Apr 2020

Yeah, this is how unlawfuls are supposed to act, not lawfuls - lawfuls have docking, no opposition as they are sieging bases that paid them and are also lawful, have access to full cap line. Destruction should be the last resort and I doubt the laws would even pass staff approval without some monetary fine sub-step?

It's completely normal btw to let bases degrade some 15% and then restock at once when it's high core, so you can take breaks from the game - I just don't understand why gov would ever go the quick destruction route after one post and a couple bumps for barely degraded bases ?
Reply  
Offline Karlotta
12-10-2022, 05:56 PM,
#37
Banned
Posts: 2,756
Threads: 85
Joined: Sep 2016

(12-10-2022, 04:21 PM)Racerdude Wrote: Individual players not role playing properly is one thing, but a government not obeying it's own laws and destroying licensed POBs is just sad.

Make new laws, increase the fee to obtain/renew licenses, impose reasonable restrictions on how far a POB can degrade before the military can make boom are just a few examples of what could be done to properly address the problem of space trash. I agree that there is a problem of too many abandoned POBs floating around. This, however, is not the correct course of action.

Unfortunately, the toxics chased away a dev that had a fix for this problem. But I'll just shut up and color.

This.

There also seems to be a problem of gov blaming the state of affairs with pobs on admins and rules, by the sound of it (could be wrong, I'm not psychic).

Gov wouldnt be wrong about that, but the truth is govs, admins, and devs could all be doing a better job of managing pobs, individually and collectively.

However that would require open and honest conversations where a rational discussion of ideas takes place, between govs, admins, devs, players that have pobs, and those that are annoyed by them.

But that is something discoGC is genuinely incapable of doing.

Not because it's actually that hard, but because the "major parties" here are entrenched in their closed channel echo chambers, egos, tribes, and lets call a spade a spade... brain dead one-liner meme way of thinking and "arguing" that disco has made the obligatory end-all of every attempt of discussion.

inb4
"delete pobs"
"lol conspiracy"
"heavy decision"
"disco is old game and glorious staff does this for free so show them some humility/respect/submissiveness"

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Kherty
12-10-2022, 06:55 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-10-2022, 07:01 PM by Kherty.)
#38
Trust Me, I'm Everywhere
Posts: 790
Threads: 138
Joined: Mar 2013

(12-10-2022, 05:56 PM)Karlotta Wrote:
(12-10-2022, 04:21 PM)Racerdude Wrote: -snip-
-snip-

I can only agree with you two. I honestly have a lot of things to say, about a lot of the decisions BretGov made, etc., etc., etc., but I won't continue to share my opinions here; mainly because it's a feedback thread, and I follow what @St.Denis said about this "discussion", so this will be my last "contribution".

Then again, everything you said so far is aligning with my point of view.

(12-10-2022, 05:56 PM)Karlotta Wrote: Not because it's actually that hard, but because the "major parties" here are entrenched in their closed channel echo chambers, egos, tribes, and lets call a spade a spade... brain dead one-liner meme way of thinking and "arguing" that disco has made the obligatory end-all of every attempt of discussion.

Also quoting this to make it very much clear that, once again, it is unfortunately very true. It plagues the entire discoGC "community". It can't be called a community anymore at this point honestly. It's just closed echo chambers, groups of people, biased people who confirms their skewed and distorted point of views, and these echo chambers only intensifying within them these distorted PoV and opinions: and what you get is closed-off sub-communities who hate each other and think they're the "only sane people and everyone is just an A-hole", or something like that.

It's applicable in this case as well.


I believe another thread should be made about this, but nobody here is reasonable, and are indeed entrenched. It will be merely be going back and forth because:
"my opinion > your opinion", and nobody will ever change their opinion(s) here.

"Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop taking it seriously." - Hunter S. Thompson
Favorite song
Second favorite song
Third favorite song
Did you sent something to me/factions/etc. and I forgot about it? Please send a message >here<!
[Image: 4YNVxKW.png]
Reply  
Offline Darius
12-10-2022, 07:03 PM,
#39
The Lion of Bretonia
Posts: 1,411
Threads: 304
Joined: Aug 2020

Actually please allow me to mention that the feedback was taken into consideration. As already stated, the base registration laws were amended as a first step. I'm right now a bit busy with working over other threads but the base laws will be overhauled soon enough to make more sense.

Answering this from my personal account so people don't just believe we exist for nothing. I'll set up a motion in BretGov in the next days detailing what we can/can't change, etcetera.

Bare with us.
Reply  
Offline Stewgar
12-10-2022, 07:43 PM,
#40
Member
Posts: 567
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2013

(12-10-2022, 07:03 PM)DariusCiprian Wrote: Actually please allow me to mention that the feedback was taken into consideration. As already stated, the base registration laws were amended as a first step. I'm right now a bit busy with working over other threads but the base laws will be overhauled soon enough to make more sense.

Answering this from my personal account so people don't just believe we exist for nothing. I'll set up a motion in BretGov in the next days detailing what we can/can't change, etcetera.

Bare with us.

That is good to hear. I would suggest also that any current POB licensed under Bret Gov NOT be grandfathered into new laws and policies and that they will apply after renewal of licenses. Reason for this is that people spent money under certain conditions. It would not be fair to change those conditions without at least monetary compensation.

It ain't about what you are capable of, it's about what you're willing to do.
Reply  
Pages (13): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 13 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode