• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 329 330 331 332 333 … 546 Next »
Capital Ship Rebalancing Proposal

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Capital Ship Rebalancing Proposal
Offline Tenacity
02-12-2010, 08:24 PM,
#41
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:No skin off my nose. The Geb should have been a BS to begin with. A grandfather clause should have some stipulations in it though. It wouldn't be terribly fair if someone knowlingly purchased a Geb two weeks before the BS conversion, in the hopes of saving cash.

Maybe a minimum of 6 months of ownership as a prerequisite for a free BS conversion?

I'd be fine with that, and of course no converted ships would get any weapons (they'd start off as a blank slate and have to buy bs guns).

Thing is, how many people would end up complaining that the order now has two light battleships? The Geb and osiris are the same size, so unless the geb gets an entirely new model to make it a heavy battleship (which isnt a bad idea either, since the order lacks a dreadnaught) there's no real point in converting it.

Making it a heavy bs like the liberty carrier though, that would give us a shipclass we dont have, fix a shipclass that's basically broken, and make me a very happy player =P

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Lunaphase
02-12-2010, 08:59 PM,
#42
Member
Posts: 1,405
Threads: 68
Joined: Apr 2008

Also if that happened the liberty house would then have 3 battleships.

[Image: lunasig2.png]
  Reply  
Offline NonSequitor
02-12-2010, 09:23 PM,
#43
Member
Posts: 911
Threads: 116
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:Also if that happened the liberty house would then have 3 battleships.

Well... no.

In my suggestion I stated that BCs as a ship class could be eliminated as being superfluous. No one would really miss them.

So, in the case of the Liberty shipline, the LABC would get deep-sixed, leaving the Siege Cruiser, the Dreadnought (a BS) and the Liberty Assault Carrier (the other BS).
  Reply  
Offline Tenacity
02-12-2010, 09:25 PM,
#44
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:Well... no.

In my suggestion I stated that BCs as a ship class could be eliminated as being superfluous. No one would really miss them.

So, in the case of the Liberty shipline, the LABC would get deep-sixed, leaving the Siege Cruiser, the Dreadnought (a BS) and the Liberty Assault Carrier (the other BS).

Either that, or the LABC would need to simply be re-balanced as a heavy cruiser, rather than a battlecruiser. Either way, bc's wouldnt exist any longer.

The reason the Geb would become a BS and not a normal cruiser is due to it's current size and armament, the thing is already the size of a battleship and in many ways plays like a psuedo-battleship. It is not balanced like any of the other battlecruisers in the mod, and never really has been.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
02-14-2010, 06:06 AM,
#45
Unregistered
 

No, this would limit Heavy Battleship's energy loadout type things. I personally like to fire with regenning so I can fire mortars/heavy mortars again in a battle. This would limit it severely.

Instead, Primaries should be for Heavy battleships, and Secondaries would be for Light battleships equivalent to primaries. Secondaries, however, would have altered stats (better damage for one)
Reply  
Offline Jeremy Hunter
02-16-2010, 02:18 AM,
#46
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

Wow...I agree with you.
*head reels.*

[Image: jeremy10.png]
May you ever walk in the Light, Shizune.
Reply  
Offline Grimly
02-16-2010, 01:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-16-2010, 01:28 PM by Grimly.)
#47
Member
Posts: 1,059
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2008

Caps need more changes. It can't be done this way.

Last of my suggestion failed also not for that only reason. I would suggest someone leave at least one or two modded ship line that illustrate the changes for tests. The testers will then be able to give a feedback.

[Image: signature2b.png]
Taking what's yours since 816 A.S.
  Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode