• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next »
revised models

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »
revised models
Offline Jinx
02-22-2009, 03:38 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-22-2009, 03:38 PM by Jinx.)
#1
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

just an update -

this one is for kuraine, who asked for a VHF and a bomber some time ago. both ships were made and included for 4.85 - but i was never happy with the bomber... so here is the revised model for the GC bomber

[Image: GCbomber_revised.png]


the below shows a revised version for the Catamaran / Red Catamaran

[Image: catamaran_new.png]
cause Mohrs Catamaran model wasn t suited to be resized to an "appropriate size" - and the ship stayed kind of unhittable ( in reasonable terms ) - this is a new model that is larger than the current catamaran. - shapewise, it follows the BHG bomber concept ( small profile from the front, large profile from the side ) - both torpedos are mounted on the spinaltube and fired right out of the nose

edit: the red catamaran is of course a red version of the knf version again.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Saigo.Watanabe
02-22-2009, 03:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-22-2009, 03:40 PM by Saigo.Watanabe.)
#2
Member
Posts: 847
Threads: 41
Joined: May 2008

I must say. Get that GC Bomber in naw!

That one is so much better then the current one. Nice work, once again!

The Cat though seems to be Very thin, too thin...

[Image: 1lNfI0Y.jpg]
"Time is too precious to be idle." - Saigo Watanabe
"Death is something that is inevitable, Something you cannot run away from." - Katharina Hildegard
Now going under the gaming name: Seraxia
www.twitter.com/Seraxia
Reply  
Offline Tic
02-22-2009, 03:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-22-2009, 03:42 PM by Tic.)
#3
Member
Posts: 1,211
Threads: 109
Joined: Nov 2007

To be honest old Catamaran looked more FLish...

This new one looks like something from Need For Speed..

The GC bomber is beautiful, but with those wing it'll catch SNs and Mini's like crazy...
  Reply  
Offline Dopamino
02-22-2009, 04:10 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 3,522
Threads: 70
Joined: Jul 2007

I like the changes to the GC bomber, but the BD bomber is definitely a step down in my opinion. It looks like you had several design themes in your head and then just decided to go with all of them.

[Image: GlossyNew2copy-1.png]
I mostly lurk around Media Center these days.
  Reply  
Offline Saigo.Watanabe
02-22-2009, 04:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-22-2009, 04:15 PM by Saigo.Watanabe.)
#5
Member
Posts: 847
Threads: 41
Joined: May 2008

Quote:but with those wing it'll catch SNs and Mini's like crazy...

The First gc bomber is a lot worse then that.


edit:
To add onto the cat, it doesn't look as good as the old version but i do agree that they need a revised model.

[Image: 1lNfI0Y.jpg]
"Time is too precious to be idle." - Saigo Watanabe
"Death is something that is inevitable, Something you cannot run away from." - Katharina Hildegard
Now going under the gaming name: Seraxia
www.twitter.com/Seraxia
Reply  
Offline Doom
02-22-2009, 04:23 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,694
Threads: 29
Joined: Apr 2006

actually new "cats" are better then old one in every aspect imaginable. They look better IMO, and although they appear thin they are not. In fact, new model is wider. Even nose section. That makes it longer then cats. But Cats are so small that even kusari VHF seems huge beside it.

So i would vote that they go in.
Reply  
Offline Saigo.Watanabe
02-22-2009, 04:27 PM,
#7
Member
Posts: 847
Threads: 41
Joined: May 2008

As long as its better then the old cat in balance wise, im all up for them getting in. i know how annoying they are to hit, i fly one aswell and i fight them heh.

[Image: 1lNfI0Y.jpg]
"Time is too precious to be idle." - Saigo Watanabe
"Death is something that is inevitable, Something you cannot run away from." - Katharina Hildegard
Now going under the gaming name: Seraxia
www.twitter.com/Seraxia
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
02-22-2009, 06:15 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

The new model was implemented almost entirely due to balance issues with the old model, which did not respond well to size and balance treatments.

It was simply too small.

This new version is, I assure you, an extremely lovely bit of work. High quality work across the board and manages a lot of the problems associated with the old ship.
Reply  
Offline Jihadjoe
02-22-2009, 06:15 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-22-2009, 06:16 PM by Jihadjoe.)
#9
Custom User Title
Posts: 6,598
Threads: 664
Joined: Nov 2007

The new cat looks to brutal and funstional. Not beautiful enough for the kusari bomber.

Not that it doesn't look cool. It's a very nicely made bomber, but it just doesn'#t look like the kind of 'form and function' ethic that the dragon HF, chimeara, and BD HF seem to have.

I think the main problem I have with it would be the cockpit.

[Image: DramaticExit.gif]
Reply  
Offline globalplayer-svk
02-22-2009, 06:25 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 45
Joined: Sep 2007

hm, and will be possible to hit this new cat in fighters/bombers fight? where you shoot to your enemy most from front or behind ?

[Image: vladsignature.png]
  Reply  
Pages (9): 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode