Since I've had a bit of spare time, I've been rolling around on the Wiki, looking at ship reviews, and noticed a problem.
There aren't that many.
So, over the next few weeks, I'll be posting here with links to what ships I've reviewed. (At the moment I'm doing lots of Liberty ships) If you want, you can post below with a link to what ships you've reviewed, and I'll edit this post with a link to what you edited. Also, try and make a priority of ships that have no review. Feel free to provide feedback on how I'm doing, and how biased ( Don't shoot me for using that word please ) I am.
Links:
Refer to post number 4 by Denelo for the current ships that need reviews. ( I wouldn't bother trying to mess with the old mk1 light fighters and the like )
Credits:
So far just a huuge kudos to Denelo, who has provided links in the 4th post to a large number of ships that need reviews. ( I wouldn't bother trying to mess with the old mk1 light fighters and the like )
Also thanks to Prysin for pitching in a lot of reviews.
Please note that these are ships that have no review at all, not ships that need a review. Some ships - like the Kusari Gunboat and Liberty Gunboat - have small, highly ineffective 1-2 sentence reviews. In all honesty, any ship could use a review.
In other news: "You are about to close 263 tabs. Would you like to continue?"
Just wrote one up for the Wyrm. I'll see about making some more eventually.
One thing that I've noticed, though: Why do all the reviews go under the "Handling" category? Not all the reviews are about how a ship handles. Wouldn't it be better to paste the actual agility and turning stats from FLStat in that category, and make a new category altogether for reviews?
' Wrote:Just wrote one up for the Wyrm. I'll see about making some more eventually.
One thing that I've noticed, though: Why do all the reviews go under the "Handling" category? Not all the reviews are about how a ship handles. Wouldn't it be better to paste the actual agility and turning stats from FLStat in that category, and make a new category altogether for reviews?
Added Zukeenee to the reviews section, and the Wyrm.
As for why they go under the handling, I'm not sure. What you have is a good idea, and it oughta be implemented. But I'm just a reviewer, I try and not mess around with the wiki too much.
Edit: Added the Virage and the Wraith, and starting a review on the Charon
In the Virage's review, it says it doesn't count the Manta, but I believe you meant the Hammerhead, because the Manta is far from sucking:)
Also, I would be glad to help, but really, I haven't flown many ships.
There is a problem with your reviews. Namely, you write them based only off of number crunching. Like the Wraith review for example. If I want to read up on number crunching I will just open up the wiki and compare the numbers.
If you want to write a review you have to fly that ship for a certain period of time so you know how it behaves in different combat situations, and how good it is with different maneuvers, and not just compare numbers with other ships.
I dont like them really. If you just want to spam reviews on every possible ship thats fine with me, but in my opinion, Quality > Quantity.
And Im curios, how much time did you spend flying the Templar? From what I see in your review, I'd say under 5 hours.
And please dont take this post as some sort of assault, take it as a form of advice or simply ignore it.