• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 448 449 450 451 452 … 546 Next »
Cargo transport

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »
Cargo transport
Offline Linkus
08-21-2008, 12:40 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

After fiddling around with a few different designs I came up with this simple one. Similar to the current train but different at the same time. It also has a total of 9 cargo pods. I'm unsure how many the Advanced Train has but If I remember right it's around 16 in total.

[Image: cargo1og3.jpg]
[Image: cargo2ra4.jpg]
[Image: cargo3jm5.jpg][Image: cargo4rm8.jpg]
[Image: cargo5tl2.jpg]

As usual, thoughts and comments are always welcome and criticism is one of the best things you can give so please do not spare anything!:)





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline Heartless
08-21-2008, 12:42 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,529
Threads: 107
Joined: Nov 2007

nice, the engines are massive! I love the side view.

[Image: Cg7QQEd.png]
[Image: 14jn684.jpg]
SwissScorch --> Heartless
Reply  
Offline Xing
08-21-2008, 12:43 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 5,274
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2007

engines a bit too proeminent I think. Otherwise, its quite nice.

[Image: audrey03a.png]
  Reply  
Offline Linkus
08-21-2008, 12:44 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

I realise now the engines are indeed massive >.<
I can size them down but I'd actually prefer to add more pods ontop and below the current ones.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline Silent_M
08-21-2008, 12:46 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 100
Threads: 2
Joined: Jun 2008

The adv. transport has 8 cargopods afaik...

I really like that design, the engines look very muscular and purpose built, not like those sissy ones on the trains;)maybe you could redesign the container part. maybe make it tubular in design instead of flat? that is the only part that looks a bit boring at the moment.

[Image: m8d98g.png]
Jan Knoll at your service
  Reply  
Offline Linkus
08-21-2008, 01:18 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-21-2008, 01:20 AM by Linkus.)
#6
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

Perhaps this might be a bit overkill then?:P
[Image: cargo21os7.jpg]
[Image: cargo22hr5.jpg]
[Image: cargo23te2.jpg]
[Image: cargo24sd7.jpg]
[Image: cargo25oj3.jpg]





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline darksam
08-21-2008, 01:26 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 33
Threads: 8
Joined: Feb 2008

like the design but need really is cargo space and not only containers, wasting space in ship

Zoner-DarkSam - Trader
Open Minds, to the old generation.
[Image: darksam18fab.png]
  Reply  
Offline Linkus
08-21-2008, 01:47 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

The containers are merely meant to represent the proper Freelancer containers that trains use. A lot of goods need to be kept apart remember so seperate containers are good for that AND loading/unloading at stations is far far easier using containers.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline El Nino
08-21-2008, 11:47 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 25
Joined: Dec 2007

This looks like just overkill, to me, or not if we outfit it with 15000 cargo capacity... (not going to happen) The first one was good enought, a bit smaller engines, and perhaps two large pods, instead of that many... they jsut take up polys... Well I simply think the ship is to close to the train we already have... as in, why replace something that is perfect, we need something new... not similar...

Donate to the Poor Pilot's Fundation via Sirius Bank /givecash GreenHawk 1000000 now, and support poor pilots sirius wide!
Skype: jure.grbec
My primary char: Jose El Nino - Corsair Elder captain of the SS Greenhawk

Currently Inactive due to pursuit of life long dreams, will be back...*edited* As promised am back.

[Image: opgbar.gif][Image: rightbar.jpg]
[Image: Sungi_sig.png]
  Reply  
Offline Cyro
08-21-2008, 12:17 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 292
Threads: 11
Joined: May 2008

' Wrote:Perhaps this might be a bit overkill then?:P
[Image: cargo21os7.jpg]
[Image: cargo22hr5.jpg]
[Image: cargo23te2.jpg]
[Image: cargo24sd7.jpg]
[Image: cargo25oj3.jpg]

It's... It's... Massive! What do you prefer it'll be? Very Heavy Train?

I wrote a really funny FL story, but it disappeared when the old forum went away. So, no lulz for you today.
  Reply  
Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode