To: Bretonia Armed Forces Admiralty Office

[Apollon]

- - - - - INCOMING TRANSMISSION - - - - -

COMM ID: ADM REASER, Natalie A.
TARGET ID: BAFCOM, Office of the Admiralty
ENCRYPTION: LIBNAV-THETA-14
PRIORITY: HIGH

Dear allies,

I'll skip the pleasantries. While the Navy understands that winning this war is no easy task and will require as many forces and parties to participate, that does not allow for such parties to have free roam in the Kingdom to harass and threaten other allied forces.

The Coalition has proven to be a nuisance for us and will need to be dealt with, I'm sure FA Steiner knows about what I'm referring to. They are out of control, refusing to obey their host's military highest command and doing what they please and like. The Navy has stilled itself from actively obliterating these bloody commies for very obvious reasons. But, if they persist to prove themselves to be an obstacle and threat to our battlegroups' security and operations, the Navy will have to take direct action to erase such threat by any means possible. I'm quite certain that both of us know that such an operation will not prove to be beneficial to our war effort.

So the inquiry I bring is this: To what extent can Her Majesty's Armed Forces control those war dogs and keep them in line? Will the BAF put the leash on them and preserve our overall security and counter-attack momentum or will we have to dedicate time, manpower and effort to resolving this situation.

We ask for your cooperation.

Reaser, Natalie A.
Admiral
Liberty Navy Primary Fleet, Admiralty Office
CO Nevada Battlegroup

Important: This communication remains the property of the Liberty Defense Forces and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Neural Net Communications Act 807A.S, Section 30. If you have received this message in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the communication.

- - - - - SIGNAL LOST - - - - -

---

[Victor Steiner]

Admiral Natalie A. Reaser

If I remember correctly, and I do, you are just as much responsible for yesterday's encounter as Marshal Keller. Instead of obeying a lawfully given order in a foreign house, you chose to ignore it and exacerbate the problem. Dare I say that such behavior would not be tolerated within Liberty's borders, so why should we tolerate it in ours? Make no mistake, however, I will be sending a letter to the SCRA as well.

I do not want to have this conversation again.

Admiral Sir E. Steiner
First Sea Lord

Bretonian Armed Forces

---

[Apollon]

- - - - - INCOMING TRANSMISSION - - - - -

COMM ID: ADM REASER, Natalie A.
TARGET ID: BAFCOM, Office of the Admiralty
ENCRYPTION: LIBNAV-THETA-14
PRIORITY: HIGH

Admiral Steiner,

You misunderstand the situation. I would not allow a bunch of Coalition pilots to threaten the safety of my men and our battlegroups, especially in the presence of what appeared to be your incapability to force a group hostile to your allies to back out of the quarrel. If you do not have the capabilities to force the Coalition to disembark and fall back and deal with the instigators of this problem, I find no reason to listen to an unjust command that will only strengthen the Coalition's ego an will to oppose. That said, within Liberty's borders, sir Steiner, if a fellow NATO member was threatened or harassed by a party regardless of what it is or its affiliation, the Navy will not stand idle and blame said NATO member for the hostile incident. And last I checked, the Commies aren't bloody NATO.

If the Armed Forces likes to put both the Navy and the Coalition on an equal level, then there will be a lot to reconsider. The Navy has a few options on the table and are discussing a possible course of action - should you fail to keep the Coalition under leash. I trust that you will bring us good news, and such an unfortunate encounter would not happen again and force our hands to perform actions that both of us would like to avoid if necessary. When it comes to the Coalition, Liberty's interest is your interest.

That is all.

Reaser, Natalie A.
Admiral
Liberty Navy Primary Fleet, Admiralty Office
CO Nevada Battlegroup

Important: This communication remains the property of the Liberty Defense Forces and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Neural Net Communications Act 807A.S, Section 30. If you have received this message in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the communication.

- - - - - SIGNAL LOST - - - - -

---