Sender: Dona Enma de Loyola. Recipient:Lukas Keller Topic:Why Coalition sucks so badly?
Hola,
I am admitted to asking you one thing. Why Coalition sucks so badly? You have been an insider so I hope for first-hand knowledge. Like they still didn't even answer my official apology demand.
ATTACHMENTS:
<none>
Dona Enma de Loyola
Loyola Tactical Solutions Group Ltd Amor Vincit Omnia
[Message Begins]
I don't know who you are or how you got this frequency. But you have some explaining to do before I start giving you answers. I'm not an open source encyclopedia on incompetence.
Sender: Dona Enma de Loyola. Recipient:Lukas Keller Topic:Why Coalition sucks so badly?
Hola,
I am the Outcast noble and I am having a contacts of most of the important people In Sirius. Now, what sort of explaining do you want? Also, you don't have to be rude, my man.
ATTACHMENTS:
<none>
Dona Enma de Loyola
Loyola Tactical Solutions Group Ltd Amor Vincit Omnia
I just wanted to know if I needed to kill a potential spy for feeding you information about me. But since you claim this to be your own initiative and not that of a third party, I'll cut the aggression and instead give you an answer.
The reason the Coalition "sucks" is simple enough. It's an army of lions ruled by sheep, and the lions kill themselves in the interest of the craven comrades who occupy the highest rungs of the ladder. What are you left with? A den minus any reason for pride, where the only survivors of such strife are the harmless and the incompetent. A nation that separates its warriors and scholars is doomed to be lead by cowards, and to have its battles fought by fools.
And for what it's worth, I'm sorry about your people. But even the Coalition could not claim with certainty that they were responsible. I hope that will be all.
Goodbye.
[Transmission Terminates]
"Knowing Humanity - We will be duty, bloody and unavoidable."
Sender: Dona Enma de Loyola. Recipient:Lukas Keller Topic:Why Coalition sucks so badly?
Hola,
Lion would never allow the sheep to rule over them. I think you overestimate the coalition populus. The lion would not even concern themselves with the opinions of the sheep, quit following it. And you sound like a mix of right-wing philosopher and something-something stratocracy. I clearly understand why people like you part their ways with the coalition, but I still did not get a proper answer to my question. Why the Coalition sucks so badly?
As for Hispania sabotage, you sound like you just trust Coalition's own historical research materials. I am pretty sure that Coalition sabotage teams are at fault and I needed only formal apology to start and try to cooperate with them.
ATTACHMENTS:
<none>
Dona Enma de Loyola
Loyola Tactical Solutions Group Ltd Amor Vincit Omnia
The Coalition in particular is an entity steeped in incompetence and insubordination. There have been several occasions where I have given an order, only to see it not followed and for the result to be the deaths of the fools not following it. This is because every pilot, no matter how insignificant their potential might be, sees themselves as the next herald of the great revolution, and completely disregards the need for discipline and subordination in war. A commander is more aware of the right time to strike, having the training and experience necessary to gauge when the most damage can be dealt and when it is time to withdraw. The Coalition is also quite fond of heavy handed propaganda and censorship, so the people rarely ever think critically and are thus more akin to ants drudging through the dirt. Critical thinkers are executed for treason, and criticism is seen as a crime.
It's a strain of incompetence that almost feels systemic. So when the brightest minds and the most talented are seen as threats and disposed of accordingly, the result is quite natural. You are left with garbage. And I grew tired of the stench. So instead of expecting an apology and trying to cooperate with them, do us all a favor and kill them instead. I would also like you to note that I have answered your question twice now, once plainly and once with elaboration. I will not answer a third time.