To n00bl3t

[Cannon]

I note that you have the following text in your signature

"The innocent have nothing to fear, except their rule violation reports being revealed to the reported party."

I want to know when, who and what was revealed. I have investigated this and can find no evidence of this ever happening.

Put up some actual evidence or I'll remove your signature.

Let's do this in public so that nothing is hidden.

EDIT: Actually, I'll settle for even vague hearsay. Who said what and to who? I note you record all skype chats. Post 'em here.

EDIT: I of course have assumed that you're refering you an admin revealing a violation report. I definitely want to know if this is the case -- but it is nothing to do with admins then I don't care and don't want to know. I do want you to clarify which it is though.

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3

[Cannon]

What part of "to nooblet" is confusing? Stay out of this if you're not him.

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3

[n00bl3t]

Morning.

I already sent the entire thing to Athenian. Or not the entire thing, but close enough. I thought you guys communicate?

However, sure, if you want to have me type it out here, just post another confirmation post and I will.

I will be delayed however, and it will probably come out later tonight, as I have work and I had someone on Skype poke me towards this.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Cannon]

Yes, I've seen your message. You claim an administrator gave a violation report to the reported party. This was investigated and absolutely no evidence found.

I want evidence of this from you. Type away...

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3

[n00bl3t]

Noted. (The thread, has important words which I like.)

EDIT: Actually, I'll settle for even vague hearsay. Who said what and to who? I note you record all skype chats. Post 'em here.

Yes, I've seen your message. You claim an administrator gave a violation report to the reported party. This was investigated and absolutely no evidence found.

I want evidence of this from you. Type away...

[4/3/2011 9:29:19 AM] V.Cross: Think I don't know about the report the Croners filed against OSI?
[4/3/2011 9:29:29 AM] V.Cross: Claiming we should be disbanded?
[4/3/2011 9:29:56 AM] V.Cross: Because Croner leadership felt we didn't follow Zoner RP nor were we active enough?
[4/3/2011 9:30:18 AM] V.Cross: Yes, OSI was informed about it. Admins said the Croners were nuts and almost revoked your status over it

This specific portion of the chat is typed, in case people cannot squint hard enough.

I can find a better resolution for the images, if their authenticity is doubted. The first SS is that of the chat, and proving that Cross/Daedric said those things. The second SS is linking Daedric on the forums to his Skype account. I think that is about as focused as the hearsay gets, and since you said you would accept it, here it is.

My sincere apologies to Manuel. I just could not be bothered editing the SS of the Skype chat to censor your name or what you said, since it was utterly irrelevant.

Going back to work. I cannot believe this unsettled me so much. Ergh.

Edit: I left out some other chat because I do not have the time to find it now, but I will later.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Cannon]

Nice but where's the bit about an admin leaking a violation report?

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3

[n00bl3t]

Nice but where's the bit about an admin leaking a violation report?

Comes under the last line of what Cross said, but there is also other chat transcripts which I think go into this further.

At work, memory is blurry.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[n00bl3t]

Bleh. Lock.

Going back to work.

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.

[Cannon]

Right then.

I'm going to publicly clarify a few things about the violation report that this situation is discussing.

It wasn't really a violation report but rather a request to the admins for help to resolve a complex situation involving multiple factions - not just the two mentioned here. This request was submitted through the violation report sub-forum.

The report does not ask that the OSI should be disbanded. Neither the OSI or ]o[ should be at each other's throats over this because it did not happen.

I am confident that an admin did not sent information about the contents of this request to anybody. I think the above paragraph is the most that any admin has said publicly.

Obviously I could be wrong. If an admin did intentionally provide details of a report to a reported party then this would result in disciplinary action. I include myself in this.

After talking this over with n00bl3t, he has removed the signature line making this claim.

This thread's usefulness is at an end. Locked.

---

Proud member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"

Old Avatar #2 | Old Avatar #3