• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 157 158 159 160 161 … 546 Next »
Removing MK I ships as a species.

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
Removing MK I ships as a species.
Offline sindroms
03-21-2013, 08:19 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

With how fast new players advance when it comes to income, especially if they are introduced to the Restart Rhino early on, it makes me wonder why do we still keep the MK I ships such as the Dagger, Mule, Defender, Patriot and such. While the obvious reason for this is that the NPCs would have to be fully remade and new levels made in order to have Liberators and Hyenas in Level 1 missions, I still do not think that it is a valid argument. It would be a bit tedious to fix, true, but by doing so we could free up some space for some new ships. And by that I mean the sellpoints. Otherwise when it comes to some ships like the Grizzly, for example, you have to sneak around guard systems. Might as well plonk it somewhere more notable.

Thoughts?

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Omicron
03-21-2013, 08:20 AM,
#2
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

Devs commented on this in lines of "Players will Q.Q if we remove their favourite vanillia fighters" even if them having mk2 equivalent with the same model.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
03-21-2013, 08:23 AM,
#3
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

They are already going to be removed from 4.87. They'll remain available as templates, but no NPCs will use them (unless their stats are beefed to be as effective as the MK2 variants, such as the Sabre and Titan) and they'll not be for sale anywhere.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline sindroms
03-21-2013, 08:27 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

Aeternus, can I suggest keeping a Starflyer on the Barrier gate for ship liquidizing purposes?

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Toaster
03-21-2013, 10:11 AM,
#5
Caution: Do NOT Insert Fingers
Posts: 3,139
Threads: 249
Joined: Sep 2010

Do Mk I ships include all of the old ships (Rhino, etc) or only those that have a beefed version (Defender, Patriot, etc)?

[Image: NbE3ZJ9.png]
Olivia Sable
Reply  
Offline jammi
03-21-2013, 10:28 AM,
#6
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,542
Threads: 360
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

Only those that have a more powerful model clone. So ships like the Rhino and Humpback are safe.

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
03-21-2013, 10:39 AM,
#7
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

Spazzy: The Startracker will remain available at a number of locations. Not barrier gate though, need those salepoints for other ships Freelancers may want to grab. BW gunboat and the likes.

Toaster: Any ship that has an MK2 version, or full replacement, will have their original removed. So ships like the Patriot and Defender will be disappearing. Rhino I'm not certain about yet - will prolly try and get Blodo to beef it up a bit, to a lighter freighter. It only affects some vanilla fighters and freighters as a result.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Xenosaga
03-21-2013, 02:32 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 497
Threads: 35
Joined: Oct 2010

I've said it numerous times and received Flak for it, but my opinion remains unchanged:

MK II fighters should receive a different model, MK I fighters can stay as they are now.
They don't even need to be drastically changed, add an additional fin, wing or engine or so. Their general texture can be retained too. As an example, this is the upgraded Crusader of the pretty old Evolutions mod: http://the-starport.net/uploads/extgalle..._8ddda.jpg
(Disclaimer: Not made by me)

I always saw the MK II ships reusing MK I models as some kind of very cheap makeshift solution until proper models get made. But they stayed ever since I played Disco for the first time.

Them having the same model just makes no sense RP-wise either. You cannot boost hull strength, power output, let alone agility by exclusively upgrading interior components. Yes, there are military aircraft that get updated and look pretty similiar to the base version, but 1. they do not look exactly the same and 2. they do not receive upgrades that improve their durability and firepower fivefold like on Disco.
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
03-22-2013, 03:19 PM,
#9
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

Yet you can do so by using higher strength materials, more technically advanced reactors and power transfer systems (which are more expensive). There is no real reason why a ship as big as a Sabre wouldn't have the same endurance as one. Replacing the ships with completely new models might be done at some point, but frankly, we don't have the modellers for that kind of ship replacement project at this point - and the vanilla ships work fine.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Sava
03-24-2013, 01:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-24-2013, 02:52 PM by Sava.)
#10
Member
Posts: 725
Threads: 54
Joined: Mar 2011

I would be happy without mk1/mk2 shit, but i prefer original ship names (i.e. Dagger instead of Scimitar, Crusader instead of Templar etc) and infocards.
Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode