(07-26-2016, 05:56 PM)Alley Wrote: @Skype stuff, can't be bothered to write it properly
[18:52:46] alley: some people believe because skype has been taken into account for a single instance that wasn't even processed under the ruleset that every bit of skype stuff is now ground for evidence
[18:53:10] alley: if you think about it for 10 seconds you easily realize it's not
It was an exceptional processing, don't expect skype to be the new meta.
What gives you the right to process Skype logs as evidence towards a permanent ban, branding them as malicious, whilst meanwhile you act maliciously to other forum users via Skype PM, for example making racist comments directly towards Lyth?
Ah but wait, it was "exceptional processing". You can continue to get away with being as nasty to other forum members over Skype as you want because you're not in the crosshairs, right?
There is and always has been extreme cases where Skype evidence was brought to the table to be evaluated. While it isn't frequently admissible as evidence, there are specific points which are discussed heavily and weighed in upon. While Skype might be outside the community, if the evidence points to malicious actions or plans of such, it involves the community health in general. If it's just a bad attitude, then there's no reason it should be included. It's situational based, not broad swept and collected to show they're not nice.