Well then Jack, me and Woodrow were hunting Yale reaver when he ran away to hood We asked around and when I was in the Astoriod feild Yale undocked from hood and shortly after him and Miss Hart started to shoot at me. Heres the evidence.
' Wrote:As much as I hate having to agree with Tobi, I agree with everything he said. Get off Newark and get out there ingame doing stuff. Seriously, I should charge you for parking
** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G **
** CONNECTION ESTABLISHED SUCCESSFULLY **
[font=Fixedsys]
Okay, Mister Reaper. Let's go over this again:
You are not welcome near Hood. I understand that you operated with a BAF pilot. Was that part of the "mission", that involved this utterances?
VPS-Tobi.Reaper: if anyone spots a reaver report his location please
BAF|----------------:Come on Reaver, isn't there a bounty on the BAF?
BAF|----------------:Come and collect, I dare ya.
BAF|----------------: Either that, or just leave Dublin, if you are still here that is.
Rhetorical question, I know it is.
So... you present "evidence" that shows a fight. I can't really make out where it took place. There is a battleship but it could be Essex, it could be Hood, it could be every other battleship, of which there are a few in Dublin.
If it was Hood, this fight would have been an infraction against the Hood No fire zone. The incident was likely initiated by the mission parameters quoted before and we'd even ask BAF to respect the No Fire Zone in order not to endanger civilians. We understand that sometimes it might be necessary to chase criminals into the NFZ to keep them from escaping, but this was obviously not the case.
It rather seems your mission was to carry the trouble into Hood zone or you at least were more than willing to risk that happening.
Mr. Reaper, there is a reason we don't want to have you near Hood: you are creating trouble. You are trying to set us up using whatever things you can get into your hands. Don't do that without conclusive evidence, if you want me to react.
So you talked to an IMG Defence Non-Core Member to find out about the docking. Okay, there is a witness statement, but no visual evidence.
Regards,
Jack Henderson
[font=Fixedsys][color=#CCFFFF]*** TRANSMISSION STANDBY FOR ANSWER ***
//OORP: The IMG-IFF-ed Reaver is a technichal glitch. I have pics here to show it if you must see. But I guess it is fairly obvious that there are no Reavers who are IMG IFF-ed (which doesn't make any sense at all)
Do you know what the reavers are doing? They are killing everyone apart from the IMG and mollys. What does that say?
If there was anyone that wasn't in the IMG during that area they would be killed.
So tell me because i know that the Reaver docked. Are you paying these Reavers or involved in any way for the killings of these Innocent people?
If you give me an answer I will know which people are paying them. Its either the IMG or the Mollys
' Wrote:As much as I hate having to agree with Tobi, I agree with everything he said. Get off Newark and get out there ingame doing stuff. Seriously, I should charge you for parking
** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G **
** CONNECTION ESTABLISHED SUCCESSFULLY **
[font=Fixedsys]
Sorry, Mr. Reaper, you know that there will be no answer to your unfounded accusations against my person or IMG.
If you want to continue doing that, I will file libel charges against you and inform your employer about your meddling because, honestly, I am fed up with it.
Regards,
Jack Henderson
[font=Fixedsys][color=#CCFFFF]*** TRANSMISSION STANDBY FOR ANSWER ***
Jack I believe my accusations are perfectly founded, one of your own people gave me a statement about a reaver undocking from hood, and we all know that nomad doesn't hang around essex and if that doesn't move you have about those race tracks where i was getting shot at i don't think i saw any of your poeple say hold your fire.
' Wrote:As much as I hate having to agree with Tobi, I agree with everything he said. Get off Newark and get out there ingame doing stuff. Seriously, I should charge you for parking
Crewman Reaper, while I do understand your frustrations towards the deaths of innocent civilians by the reavers, do not make unfounded (and they are unfounded) accusations towards the IMG to drive in your point.
The fact that the Reavers can dock at the Battleship Hood or fly in the 'Neutral' NFZ absolutely does not mean that they are on the IMG payroll.
On the other hand the fact that the IMG would blindly let these murderers dock and resupply at the Hood is troubling, but that is IMG policy and is NOT something you will get involved in.
**** INCOMING TRANSMISSION ****
**** TO: [color=#FFCC99]Senator Cletus Morales, Mr. Reaper ****
**** ENCRYPTION: [color=#FFCC99]HIGH *****
**** VOICE ENABLED ****
**** VIDEO UPLINK ENABLED ****
** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G **
** CONNECTION ESTABLISHED SUCCESSFULLY **
[font=Fixedsys]
Mr. Reaper, your arguments are inconclusive as always. I cannot see what the Nomads have to do with the accusations you make. If that is another doomed attempt to put blame on the IMG or myself, I can assure you we act against the Nomad threat near Hood. Trust me, the Hood medical can prove that we do that. Our pilots were/are treated there after the massacre.
As to the Reaver situation: hy hands are tied until conclusive evidence is presented. And you'd better stop it now.
Regards,
Jack Henderson
[font=Fixedsys][color=#CCFFFF]*** TRANSMISSION STANDBY FOR ANSWER ***
**** ENCRYPTION: HIGH *****
**** VOICE ENABLED ****
**** VIDEO UPLINK ENABLED ****
** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G **
** CONNECTION ESTABLISHED SUCCESSFULLY **
[font=Fixedsys]
Honoured Senator Cletus Morales, regarding your message:
I still have to be shown conclusive evidence that the Reavers use Hood as a staging base for their attacks on civilians. Needless to say, I do not condone these. Show me proof of Reaver ships undocking from Hood and some days later Hood's automated docking systems will be reprogrammed to deny docking rights to the ship in question. This is all I can do and if you call a base with automated docking systems your own, you will understand my point.
And since I have the opportunity to talk to an authority in VPS, I would like to stress that Mr. Reaper violates the ban to enter 15 k of Hood every single day. He thus endangers his own health because he will be forcibly removed. It would be regrettable if the VPS-IMG Dublin relations suffered because one of your pilots has its own agenda and does not understand that the ban is for his protection and for the protection of all parties involved.
He is a blatant agent provocateur, he set up Outcasts against IMG (which resulted in threats against our mining and today in hostilities), he goads BAF into behaving strangely against IMG, he triggers IAB hostilities against IMG, he is - in summary - exactly the opposite to what I expect of a Security Service that - as I was told by more senior Guild members - has worked for many years with IMG.
Mr. Reaper makes me get a completely different perspective of your company, which is sad. IMG could need trustworthy security in Dublin after our crafts have been attacked by numerous enemies for some days now.
If I were you, Senator, I would check on whose payroll Mr. Reaper really is because I am pretty sure he does anything but represent VPS politics in his constant and unprovoked meddling against IMG. I don't know whether you know that he was a "Shoot on Sight" for some hours or days and BAF and BPA chased him and shot at him. Then, a day later, he flew in formation with BAF and IAB, at a time in which IAB tried to frame the IMG for numerous things, all resolved by now. This was also the time he started hanging out on Hood, supposedly listening in on his new "enemies", for his newly gained "friends". Just my guess, Sir. But I think it might be worth looking into.
When (I don't even say if) he violates the ban again, do not expect all our pilots to hold back as I ordered. He is one of the most hated persons in the ranks of Dublin Defence Wing (mainly because he cheered at the losses after our Defence Wing was shredded by the Nomad's sheer power) and because he is a constant troublemaker to everybody.
Any deal about the requested placement of a VPS Carrier Craft in the IMG zone will not get my "Yes" as long as one of your employees is such a source of trouble. It's not my decision, but I bet the Directors will want to hear my opinion.
I guess it's better to know where everybody is on this board. I think now you know, which is a good start to improve the situation.
Regards,
Jack Henderson
[font=Fixedsys][color=#CCFFFF]*** TRANSMISSION STANDBY FOR ANSWER ***
I'll keep this short, we have been aware of the 'activities' of Mr Reaper for some time now.
On the Reaver case; we both agree that the *evidence* that Mr Reaper has presented is inconclusive at best and I am aware of the difficulty of keeping track of every ship that docks in a system a busy as Dublin. Yet, although it is not my place to dictate your policy I hope you are aware of these mercenaries's reputation.
The main problem here is evidence; Mr Reaper seems to cover his tracks very well and we are having a hard time confirming his activities.
Of course we have warned him multiple times about the 15k no fly zone; if he chooses to ignore it we will not hold the IMG responsible (although again, do try to gather evidence before shooting).
I assure you Mr Reaper's actions does not reflect our company's policy; this is more of a case of keeping him close. We are quite interested in what ties he has with the IAB and/or other shadowy groups.
**** ENCRYPTION: HIGH *****
**** VOICE ENABLED ****
**** VIDEO UPLINK ENABLED ****
** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G ** ** ** ** C O N N E C T I N G **
** CONNECTION ESTABLISHED SUCCESSFULLY **
[font=Fixedsys]
Honoured Senator Cletus Morales, regarding your message:
I am relieved about the distance you take towards Mr. Reaper's actions.
You said that it is hard to find evidence because he covers his tracks well.
Let's say, we collected things to cover us against his accusations.
I will give you access to the material gathered to prove that this man is a malevolent schemer and not conducive to the benefit of your company.
Thank you for listening to our trouble. I hope a solution can be found that benefits VPS as well as IMG.
I ask for your apologies for the censored parts of the visual evidence. The identity of sources gathering preemptive evidence against an individual that behaves like your agent does, can't be jeopardized.
I will rely further on these sources to provide an almost complete cover of all the activities of Mr. Reaper. You understand of course that knowing what he does is essential for the security of IMG and our relations in Dublin.
Image File #1: Trying to act against his enemies by using his contacts to the terrorist Order association. Again a false accusation is uttered system-wide. Meddling, example 1.
Image File #2: Cooperation with a known Outcast criminal, named Maximus. He is a person hostile to the IMG and responsible for loss of equipment. They seem rather close. And the term "BAF tools" sounds interesting. In my opinion Mr. Reaper behaves like a sub-leader of BAF, BPA or my best guess: IAB.
Image File #3: A seemingly working relationship between Outcast criminal and your VPS agent captured in colour.
Image File #4: Almost love? Protecting the criminal Outcast against the Bounty Hunters acting on behalf of the Bretonian Authorities. I keep asking myself: where does he take the authority from to tell the Hunters to back off? His real employer?
Image File #5: And here is my all time favourite: Yet another threat against IMG, unfounded and unproven. You notive the instrumentalisation of the Bretonian Armed Forces.
Don't get me wrong: I am preparing no court case here. I am just offering you - the employer of Mr. Reapers - a small insight into his activities.
Expect more when I get access to my home database. This is only the newest data files, uncensored IMG recorded footage will be made available soon and IMG will be called on to submit any piece of evidence gathered.
Best regards,
Jack Henderson
[font=Fixedsys][color=#CCFFFF]*** TRANSMISSION STANDBY FOR ANSWER ***