@Wesker Upon reviewing the evidence along with the clarification from the reporter as well as with the report's context being brought in a new light by the people involved, we are reversing this sanction and reinstating your access to the server. However, we would like to give you a fair warning - please consider what you write and who is around you when it comes to ingame chats. This last report, given your only recent return after your last sanction, and the resulting discussion almost ended with a much harsher decision.
@SkyNet Your report was formulated in a highly misleading manner. It was not, as you yourself put it, ''self-explanatory''. We would also like to use this chance to remind you of another issue that you need to address, given the circumstances.
For all the evidence and additional logs we as the Administration team can work with and have access to, context is very important. If players fail to explain what exactly they are implying when reporting a person, accidentally or not, they are risking to not only ending up punishing people who haven't necessarily broken server rules, but also being a subject of punishment themselves for disinformation.
We would also like to remind players to use reports as a last resort if reasoning with a supposed rulebreaker does not hold success. And no, ''I tried to before'' is not an excuse not to bother. In the case of this report, it seems as though there was no such attempt.
