Another question

[jammi]

and missiles on bombers makes it far to easy for them to kill fighters, namely LFs.

Well, the hardpoints are called 'Gun/Missile' slots for a reason. Just remove the missile capability, and you're done. No need to limit the amount of ammo that can be mounted.

---

News article library, feedback and content requests.

[tansytansey]

Well, the hardpoints are called 'Gun/Missile' slots for a reason. Just remove the missile capability, and you're done. No need to limit the amount of ammo that can be mounted.

There's no difference between Gun and Missile slots. The change isn't as simple as that. You can't have gun only slots, and you can't have missile only slots.

---

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.

[Derkylos]

Freelancer is not Starlancer. I believe it is the Devs and Igiss' intention to keep Discovery as close to the Vanilla feel as possible, and completely revamping the combat system is not the way to do that.

Actually, reducing shield capacity on caps and upping their hull would move them closer to vanilla, where they had no shields at all...and one could conceive fighters blowing off capital equipment in vanilla...assuming they aren't the "blow-em-up-with-catapults" style capship...

---