• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 305 306 307 308 309 … 546 Next »
A new ship type

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
A new ship type
Offline Lance_Uppercut
05-27-2010, 04:02 AM,
#41
Member
Posts: 426
Threads: 35
Joined: Jul 2009

I like the idea a lot.
When I think bomber, I like what we have for anti-cap fighters, but there aren't really "bombers" per se...

[Image: russian-bomber.jpg]

Like this. Kinda, y'know... totally screwed on their own against fighters, but with some protection, can wreck capital ships and/or stations.

I'd like to see tactical bombers.

[Image: usicopy.png]

::The Pennsylvania Liberation Force
  Reply  
Offline Hawkwings
05-27-2010, 07:49 AM,
#42
Member
Posts: 781
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2007

That's not a tactical bomber, that's a strategic bomber.

What we have in-game right now are tactical bombers. We don't have strategic bombers, but that's mostly because there's no strategic targets to destroy. We can't blow up stations or bomb planets (yet).

Tactical bombers blow up tanks, warships, and bunkers. Strategic bombers blow up factories, industrial complexes, even entire cities.

|| Join the Kusari State Police || KSP Internal Affairs || KSP Message Dump || KSP Feedback ||
||Kusari Criminal Database || Kusari Legal Codex || Kusari Bounty Board ||
  Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-27-2010, 08:58 AM,
#43
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

Well this could be something right between those two. It's not so small as a tactical bomber, but it's also not big enough to be a strategic bomber. So it a) a stratecal bomber, or b) a tactegic bomber

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Durandal
05-28-2010, 12:25 AM,
#44
Member
Posts: 5,106
Threads: 264
Joined: Apr 2009

Those black faces mean the normals are inverted. The model itself is extremely bulky, lacking in detail, and nothing about it rings freelancer at all, on top of which you are using an engine grill texture for wings...

Start over, model it in max, and look at some vanilla ships for inspiration on where to place your details/textures, because as it stands now it's not going to make the cut.

As far as balance specifics go, short answer = no. Long answer = Not going to happen because it'd be way too overpowered against caps. Yes, it's giant size would make it easier to kill, but it's still not going to happen, and you'd be best off trying to make a regular ship type instead.
Reply  
Offline Luis
05-28-2010, 12:29 AM,
#45
Member
Posts: 1,964
Threads: 178
Joined: Mar 2009

' Wrote:Those black faces mean the normals are inverted. The model itself is extremely bulky, lacking in detail, and nothing about it rings freelancer at all, on top of which you are using an engine grill texture for wings...

Start over, model it in max, and look at some vanilla ships for inspiration on where to place your details/textures, because as it stands now it's not going to make the cut.

As far as balance specifics go, short answer = no. Long answer = Not going to happen because it'd be way too overpowered against caps. Yes, it's giant size would make it easier to kill, but it's still not going to happen, and you'd be best off trying to make a regular ship type instead.
  Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode