' Wrote:I'm kinda disturbed how Q_Q thing became as a term to describe anyone who is expressing disagreement. Afaik, it was used about people who were unhappy on how their roleplay went or other emotional subjective side issues.
That is right, maybe *do not QQ* in current thread was incorrect to be posted, but personally I didn`t mean to treat anyone as QQer. This was said as being part of what I consider as main disadvantage in people of community.
Quote:But I really don't get it why some people intent to discredit others by posting "U Q_Q" then they actually bring up some kind of points which are worth concideration or atleast should be falsified before you can dispose the risen question
Again, if I got you right, I am not against some emotional threads being cut with *U QQ*, but only pointless and flood-ish. It does not refer to the author of current theme.
Quote:And what you teach by this? That it's wrong then people express that they don't like something and has a pretty much solid background to explain why?
When people have solid background, then no one will treat them as QQers....except maybe trolls.
Quote:You know what this teaches - beign submissive bitch. And it's not healthy.
' Wrote:But I really don't get it why some people intent to discredit others by posting "U Q_Q" then they actually bring up some kind of points which are worth concideration or atleast should be falsified before you can dispose the risen question
You have a question,he has the answer
' Wrote:Although everyone can outwardly agree that "It's just a game" Inwardly, some treat it as more than 'just a game' & pin their self-worth on it. They don't admit it outwardly because they don't wanna be "that guy" that admits it & leave themself wide open to face the ridicule of the others that didn't fess up to the same.
' Wrote:Again, if I got you right, I am not against some emotional threads being cut with *U QQ*, but only pointless and flood-ish. It does not refer to the author of current theme.
To not cast stones, I was once pissed off by a few people here. Then I realised it's better to not give a damn.
0 eF's given since.
This.
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)
The worst thing that people get angry is those regular trollers (and we all know who they are)
If admins or some player want to point some mistake for someone, he was abused by dozen of trollers
who just wait to troll someone here on forum, and that ruin all thing and angry became more and more higher!
But when someone from "trollers" been "hurt" by admins because he do something that he shouldn't , than they try to troll admins, and admins just use a same tactic against them and one more and that is sanction. And know what... I m glad because of that!!! :yahoo:
And for democracy? Their is somewhere called supreme court ... here is called admin team... And here they must be here because 60 % here try to abuse democracy that i think we have in one moment...
The same thing as always. Q_Q, ragequitting, and a partial "hey, I'm back" a few month later after having lurked on an alt or two.
People get worked up on the devs and admins for trying to level the playing field. People get worked up on factions/indies over who should be behaving how. I've ceased to care. It's impossible to please everyone, so the occasional whiner is easily ignored. As Cannon likes to remind people, Disco isn't a democracy. Players are listened to, but ultimately, it's the admins and serverops that make the rules. Don't like that -> go play elsewhere.
Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.
Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.