I don't really know the full extent of what is going on, I came later when the CR, me the lone BAF, and GRN fought minutes later in Leeds. From what is sounds like I agree with Wasser. I wasn't there but even if he's good, give him a 1v1 or at the most a 2v1. I wouldn't go too far with that. If it was me, I would've sent ships in one or two at a time. I know you want to win but win fairly.
Wasser, i think 4v1 is a bit overkill but we all know you or the other ones you listed can take 3v1. also consider even i or shaggy can 1v2 some of our members. We lack skill. We try to compensate with numbers, thats it. Also please next time dont log off when i bring a GB to Leeds, i wanted to have a fight!
(08-18-2016, 05:30 PM)Traxit Wrote: I'm going to assume he's a GRN pilot, so of course he's not seeking to Roleplay. You're the "enemy of the crown", of course he would shoot you for being in that territory. What, you want him to eat baguettes and drink tea with you? Be real. You were a hostile in enemy territory, you got what you provoked.
You got a point here I personally dont expect GRN sitting and having a tea with us nor i have with them. I go shoot straight as it should be.
(08-18-2016, 06:17 PM)ASimpleMan Wrote: I don't really know the full extent of what is going on, I came later when the CR, me the lone BAF, and GRN fought minutes later in Leeds.
My impression was that we were talking about that encounter. I at least described that one in my previous post.
(08-20-2016, 03:50 PM)Gagadug. Wrote: Is that your balancing by numbers ? #1#2
Hi Gagadug, it is clear there was not only CR|- forces there so don't be trying to blame a "Gank" made by CR|- . We logged gunboats and fighters after GRN and there indies logged fighters to kill our bombers. Not our fault they logged off when they realized we were switching ships. Not only that but it seems 1 fighter can take on a fleet of fighters and gunboats alone.
Instead of saying "Is that your balancing by numbers?" why not tell us what we can do better?
For example not to send three Gunboats on two fighters. The fighterforce that was there, ok if they have to but missile and solarisboats were a very unecessary move.
(08-20-2016, 03:57 PM)Gagadug. Wrote: For example not send three Gunboats on two fighters. The fighterforce that was there, ok if they have to but missile and solarisboats were a very unecessary move.
When the CR forces switched ships there were alot more than 2 fighters. So instead of coming straight here "You are ganking us" Why not just keep those ships that logged off stay logged in. There was a gunboat or 2 that was confirmed by Navy. We switched to what the enemy had plus 1 more gunboat.
So please come to us with a valid complaint instead of one because the fight looked like a gank. 2 gunboats and half a dozen fighters is not down to us. We 2 gunboats and 2 fighters. The third gunboat you see actaully went and chased a GRN cap away. The rest of the forces are not ours so this is not a gank on behalf of CR but the LN Indies.
Thank you and this is all that needs to be said. Next time come with a valid complaint or criticism. Then I will be more happy to address the situation and find an out come. You are blaming us for something that is now down to us.
Gagadug, what about you go check the numbers of LN before whining about how CR| "ganking" ?
and im sure you saw how a lagging fighter was lulzing around.