Well Xenos, by and large, could give a fiddler's darn about what happens past the borders o' Liberty, let alone inciting the people of Bretonia, Kusari and Rheinland towards anarchy to unite them towards some common good or similarly baked logic. Chances are that you would find slim pickings for people power to forward such an agenda amidst the passionate crazies dashing through the halls of Ouray, Nome and the Barrow. Let alone material backing, they've trouble enough just keeping our birds in the air.
Admittedly this sounds much more Coalition than Xeno, the Xenos don't necessarily wish to pull the government down about its ears, they just want to beat a place for themselves back into it, destroy the LPI and the irredeemable system of corruption it represents and get back to turning out a buck paid for a day worked. That being the short version.
' Wrote:thats where i see the SLA and SRCA differ. their goal is to put sirius under a communist dictatorship. where the SLA are using commi(origonal marxist) aspects and ideals to eventually establish an anarchic union.
sounds like you could be coalition extremist, a group of the coalition that, over the years, have developed a radical version of the coalitions doctrines.
this could in turn put you at odds with the SCRA over differences of opinions.
could turn out to be quite interesting if done correctly
our main goal is to unite sirius...hence the anarchy part. anarchy =unity and peace
but implementing the commnnist ideals and means.
This is the part I don't get: anarchism is anarchism, not a seeking after unity, which with any type of institutionalization (which would be the goal of a political movement) means the end of anarchy.
Anarchism doesn't go with socialism or communism, since those two typically necessitate some central authority.
Even the flag you propose is really anti-anarchist. Anarchists would not "seek to unite under one cause and one flag," as that would bring about the end of the anarchy.
Could you spell out more why you think these go together?
' Wrote:This is the part I don't get: anarchism is anarchism, not a seeking after unity, which with any type of institutionalization (which would be the goal of a political movement) means the end of anarchy.
Anarchism doesn't go with socialism or communism, since those two typically necessitate some central authority.
Even the flag you propose is really anti-anarchist. Anarchists would not "seek to unite under one cause and one flag," as that would bring about the end of the anarchy.
Could you spell out more why you think these go together?
and their are many types of anarchy and their definitions vary
but original anarchy went under a solid black flag, which symbolized unity and equality...thats what it was about...thus needing no government.
anarchy isnt anti government...its pro peace. and with peace no government is needed..
The Coalition is the complete and utter opposite from any form of anarchism, I'm afraid.
Yes, they're Commies, but more along the lines of the USSR, Viet Nam, Cuba or the People's Republic of China. The Coalition are not hippy-Commies. Many of its members are downright villainous, although it has its share of heroes too.
This sounds more Bundschuh than Coalition. Just because they are leftist in economics doesn't make them Coalition.
Also, if using a terrorist sort of ID, like Xenos (the sort that allows attacks on civilians), I would advise a limited sphere of influence.
I'd suggest unfriendly or hostile towards the SCRA, to be honest. Ill-disciplined anarchists aren't the sort of folk we roll with.
' Wrote:sounds like you could be coalition extremist, a group of the coalition that, over the years, have developed a radical version of the coalitions doctrines.
this could in turn put you at odds with the SCRA over differences of opinions.
could turn out to be quite interesting if done correctly
Hmm. What you've proposed isn't a radical variation on Coalition doctrines, however. It is completely and utterly different. The Coalition, in Sol at least, was a huge empire, presumably with a government.
Anarcho-commies strike me as Bundschuh, to be honest. Or maybe Gaians. Violent space hippies? Seems to fit the bill, although they're of course eco-terrorists, it seems to fit.