How about the ammo required to fire this gun is removed? I have never seen anyone using this for obvious reasons.
My point is that removing the ammo, people may start using this creating a bit more diversity in choosing a bomber loadout.
thing is, the chaingun is pretty much the only bomber gun that can effectively tackle fighters, even some faster ones, as it shoots in straight lines and has the right projectile speed. however, bombers are not there to fight other snubs, but bigger, bulkier things. up until the chaingun, your best bet against a nasty hunter was a perfectly timed snac, which is a pain to land. less skilled bombitas are hereby given a wee bit of a better chance. or not.
edit: so in conclusion, ammo limit makes sense. though I'm not sure I do. you get it, right?
(01-02-2018, 11:24 PM)Docent Wrote: edit: so in conclusion, ammo limit makes sense. though I'm not sure I do. you get it, right?
Lol, yeah I gotcha.
I don't have a problem with the ammo limit. It's logical to only have a certain number of them since they're actually "bullets". The issue I have is the price it costs to reload. All other weapons can be fully restocked for at most $300,000, yet to fully reload the chaingun, which does significantly less damage than the others as well as running out fairly quickly, costs $1,000,000. Instead of paying for EVERY SINGLE SHOT, especially since there are 2000 of them,I think they should be sold as a magazine/clip for say, $250,000.
