(10-10-2018, 04:30 PM)Karst Wrote: That having been said, it would have been wiser to swap the models and infocards instead of the cargo holds. Would let people keep their 5ks, and also obviate the need to swap all the other stats, which by the way still needs to be done.
I don't like the way this topic is going. Now people are being agressive here. Don't get me wrong but like, this is just a debate.
I see that many people have problem with the trade lanes, they're not able to fly a transport, liner without getting stuck on the trade lane. It's a matter of practise. That other rheinland train which people are talking about, I tested it out, and guess what. It's the same as Stork for me. I'm not getting stuck on the trade lanes. I don't know about liners, because I'm not interested in flying one of those.
Now the main reason why Stork got nerfed is probably because of pirates being unable to actually shoot the transport, Stork.
(10-10-2018, 04:30 PM)Karst Wrote:
(10-10-2018, 02:45 PM)SnakThree Wrote: Entitled powertraders, unite against this oppression called balance. You shall fight againstreason and objectivity with your biased and entitled opinions!
So much this. The audacity of these people. How DARE the balance team make a change that should have been done years ago. I mean surely there's no issue with the Stork being less than a quarter the size of other 5ks while having the most guns?
The DEMANDS for compensation, when the money it takes to exchange the ships probably amounts to two or maybe three trade runs.
That having been said, it would have been wiser to swap the models and infocards instead of the cargo holds. Would let people keep their 5ks, and also obviate the need to swap all the other stats, which by the way still needs to be done.
I don't know what you meant by that "DARE." Should we be silent? I mean, I'm not the only one here wanting to know why this happened. We're also here to try to change something. Maybe it's not right, I don't know, but balance team should know that they're not the only one there balancing things. I understand you but also players should have right to express their own opinion.
I would also like to add that 200 cargo isn't a problem at all, people are just expressing their opinion about this change. We have right to do that, no?
So much crying for patetic 200 cargo space lost ...
Sell it and but some other 5000 cargo super train if it is that important,you can compensante buy/sell expenses diference with one trade run .
Otherwise , just continue fly Stork, it is STILL great ship , 200 cargo nerf is nothing ,thats not even 5% of its cargo lost .
Personally, I do not mind the 200 cargo loss, at all. It's great even, when compared to the other option of having the ship replaced with a bigger version which has more trouble with docking on the lanes.
(That is what I gathered from this thread, that the replacement would have more trouble with docking the lanes. If not, then excuse me)
I don't get the point of introducing house trading vessels that have too much trouble docking the lanes. It's just bad design.