No problem, that was a pleasure here too! Sorry again for that poor mine I threw when you CD'd, and also for rushing things out a little, I was going to work so I needed this fight to start as soon as possible.
Kudos to you too, was a great fight indeed!
I want to thank 5th|LNS-Kansas for his great sportsmanship and teamwork.
Even when your opponents have twice the number of ships, you remember that not giving your buddy a 1*1 is uncool.
[17.12.2020 14:44:00] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I'm not going to shoot at him. You're on your own.
----------
[17.12.2020 14:45:09] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I won't fight him
----------
[17.12.2020 14:48:36] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I'm not going to pile on Val.
[17.12.2020 14:30:18] Death: 46th|Summers.Wrath was put out of action by LR-Drunken.Sailor (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:32:12] Death: 46th|Greg.Splinter[R] was put out of action by MNS-Tevere (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:51:45] Death: -|-A.Aizkorri was put out of action by 46th|LNS-Lemon (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:52:32] Death: [LN]-LNS-Mount.Hood was put out of action by HS>Destino-Final (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:56:42] Death: 5th|LNS-Kansas was put out of action by [XTF]-Nighthawk (Gun).
That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
Posts: 6,307
Threads: 488
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
(12-17-2020, 05:13 PM)Ice Princess Wrote: That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
I'd say its actually more malicious to decide to not help people who need it, especially those who are defending against a POB siege.
(12-17-2020, 05:13 PM)Ice Princess Wrote: That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
In this case, it was a tactical possibility for the lawful side, which you have consciously ignored.
You have decided to wait till outcast hordes arrive and leave your team 0 chance of winning.
Your teammates isolated a careless outcast ship. They had you in the group, an OF capship, they counted on you. You let them down.
Edit:
[17.12.2020 14:42:35] [LN]-LNS-Mount.Hood: We either pile on him and prepare for fleet, or we just 1 vs 1 him and get killed in process.