• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 518 519 520 521 522 … 778 Next »
Poll: Gallic Junkers

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should Gallic Junkers get...
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Their own ID
19.51%
8 19.51%
Their own Weapons
2.44%
1 2.44%
Their own Ships
4.88%
2 4.88%
ID & Weapons
9.76%
4 9.76%
ID & Ships
0%
0 0%
Ships & Weapons
2.44%
1 2.44%
All of the Above
26.83%
11 26.83%
None of the Above
34.15%
14 34.15%
Total 41 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Poll: Gallic Junkers
Offline Benjamin
07-28-2009, 11:21 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 1,794
Threads: 9
Joined: Jan 2009

' Wrote:Now, this is a good opportunity to re-purpose and re-model the ships mentioned so far - the Gitano as a Gallic Junker Light Fighter, the Bulldog as a Gallic Junker Heavy Fighter, and the Waran as a Gallic Junker Bomber. Few, if any, players are using these ships right now, and with new models and infocards they would easily fill the purposes of the Gallic Junkers.

Er. Sure, take the Gitano. Maybe you can take the Bull Dog even, maybe. But the Waran isn't even a junker ship, and it most definitely is used. Really got no grounds for taking it.


As for all the other stuff: Do you think a faction that spends all of its time repurposing abandoned spacecraft is going to somehow produce the worst guns in the game?

Yeah me neither. But it does. So it goes.

Join Cryer Pharmaceuticals
Reply  
Offline Elsdragon
07-28-2009, 11:29 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 2,741
Threads: 59
Joined: Mar 2009

Barragers Suck so much ass. Really.SO I use a ton of codies on my junkers

No longer a slave to the man!
  Reply  
Offline Grail
07-28-2009, 11:39 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 687
Threads: 36
Joined: Sep 2008

I voted all of above. I mean, there was a historical connection by both groups, galics and sirians, but with time they went on diferent directions. And i guess the only way the had to communicate all over this time was "radio", bo personal contact so no give away sirian tech to galics, maybe blueprints of ships and another blueprints. And the galic junkers might not been wreck salvagers, low class yes, but why salvagers? They use to be on king`s court and yes, they have dirty hands, but i guess they are no wreck salvagers because there are no wrecks to clean, no field debris. Beside the Maquis and Brigands wont allowed them to move freely has sirian junkers do.

Just some thoughts

[Image: image.jpg]
LWB The Unioners Cryer~
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
07-29-2009, 01:47 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

Quote:Er. Sure, take the Gitano. Maybe you can take the Bull Dog even, maybe. But the Waran isn't even a junker ship, and it most definitely is used. Really got no grounds for taking it.

What gives you the idea that the Waran is not a junker ship? I havent seen it's infocard in .85, but throughout 4.84 it was classified as a Junker Bomber and sold only on junker stations. To my knowledge, it is still only sold on junker stations, and it probably still has the same infocard.


[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
07-29-2009, 01:55 AM,
#25
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:What gives you the idea that the Waran is not a junker ship? I havent seen it's infocard in .85, but throughout 4.84 it was classified as a Junker Bomber and sold only on junker stations. To my knowledge, it is still only sold on junker stations, and it probably still has the same infocard.

It has always been a generic quasi lawful ship. It just used to only be sold on the Junker base in New London. Ex-Hessian in theory. A run of the mill semi shady ship that anyone and their mother has access to.
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
07-29-2009, 01:58 AM,
#26
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

well, I've never seen anyone actually flying the thing, so I'm going to steal it and make a new model for it, mmkay?

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
07-29-2009, 02:03 AM,
#27
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:well, I've never seen anyone actually flying the thing, so I'm going to steal it and make a new model for it, mmkay?

Nope.

Lots of people fly it.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand you're done so far as the Waran is concerned. Move on.

[Image: junkers23.jpg]

Those are the abominations you're looking for. Though to be honest I would not be saddened in the least if the virage and havoc were re purposed. That would give you a full lineup right there.

Following a discussion on the matter of course. As obviously people don't like it when folks decide to take things for themselves out of the blue.
Reply  
Offline AJBeast
07-29-2009, 02:09 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-29-2009, 02:10 AM by AJBeast.)
#28
Member
Posts: 1,477
Threads: 55
Joined: Aug 2008

Or we could just buff the fricking recycler so it doesnt put the term "bomber" to shame , even though its tecnically a SHF...

But yeah , the Waran is Ex-Hessian , generic Unlawfull/Quasi-Lawfull. It just happens to be the best we can get our hands and that most suits us... seeing as the Recycler is <strike>a monstruous pile of poo</strike> not really a bomber. I really dont see it beeing turned into a Gallic Junker ship.

If you want to make new Gallic Junker ships , I'd say go ahead. On one hand , they make sense RP-wise , on the other the mod already seems littered with enough ships as it is. ( of which we still have the imports to replace)
Reply  
Offline Dab
07-29-2009, 02:13 AM,
#29
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

' Wrote:What gives you the idea that the Waran is not a junker ship?
What gives you the idea that the Waran -is- a Junker ship? The .84 infocard did NOT state it was a Junker ship. It has always been Border Worlds. The current .85 infocard, which is the one that matters, states it was Ex-Hessian and is now a Black Market ship sold to anyone. That includes the Xenos of Gonzales Station.

' Wrote:well, I've never seen anyone actually flying the thing, so I'm going to steal it and make a new model for it, mmkay?
I've seen 3 Reavers, as well as quite a few others. It is used, so no, you're not going to steal it and make a new model for it, mmkay? You don't get to do whatever you damn well please Tenacity, I'd have thought you'd know that by now.

You want a ship to remodel, go remodel the Bulldog. That actually -is- a Junker ship and needs a remodel. How about you ask those that fly the Waran before you think about remodelling it.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Offline Blodo
07-29-2009, 02:16 AM,
#30
No Pilot
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 128
Joined: Jan 2008

Waran Infocard Wrote:WAR-4b "Waran" Border Worlds Bomber

Before development of the Aesir shipline, the Red Hessians made use of this bomber. It, frankly, isn't very popular for a number of reasons, including a reputation for fuel leaks, the large profile that it presents to enemy vessels and the fact that it is as ugly as sin itself.

With the acquisition of finer craft, however, the Hessians dumped the ship onto the open black market wherein the bulk of the Waran found quick popularity with the "more power, more guns, fewer problems" crowd, which it turned out included virtually anyone interested in blowing things up. From Junkers to Gaians to Marauders to Xenos, this ship has found universal employment by pilots for whom style is not a concern.
Sorry Tenacity. No go. Even Xenos have the Waran at the moment.
  Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode