• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 305 306 307 308 309 … 546 Next »
A new ship type

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
A new ship type
Offline Speakeasy
05-15-2010, 03:46 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 28
Threads: 3
Joined: May 2010

That seems good. 3 torps :3

[Image: neap00.jpg]
Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-15-2010, 09:19 PM,
#32
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

Ok 3 torps/disruptors it is.

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline GHOSTbielars
05-15-2010, 11:24 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 133
Threads: 6
Joined: Mar 2008

I think its shape definitely reminds me of the B2 bomber, very sleek and fast. So I think that if this ship is put in, it should have a real high thruster speed complimented with very very bad turning. IE worse than gunship turning. That way, its usefullness would be long jousts at a battleship. This would expose it to lots of gunfire dead on, and be less likey to dodge it than a regular bomber. Then it would drop 2 NOVA torps and fly away to repeat. I think that realy could be done without changing game balance. Obviously it would hinge on its turning being so bad to counter balance the extra NOVA.

Also, maybe not boost power supply to make it drop two torps at the same time, but boost its power regen that in a certain length run it could drop 2 in much quicker succession than a reg bomber.

' Wrote:OHSH it's Igiss everyone look busy.
  Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-16-2010, 07:57 AM,
#34
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

Hmm....that is a swell idea. But I need to finish the textures, but I don't know where to start...i don't even have the images...

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-16-2010, 08:50 PM,
#35
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

I came up with a new idea for the torps: how about 2 snacs but not fireable at the same time. Example:

An ordinary bomber would aim his snac and if he misses he would swear his pants off knowing he has to wait 20 seconds for the SNAC to recharge.

While the tactical bomber would use 1 SNAC (since there's not enough energy for 2) and miss, but he would know that he only needs to wait 1-3 seconds for the energy to regenerate so he can fire again. And if he misses again then a) he's a N00B b) the other guy is cheating c) he just can't aim straight due to technical problems like his mouse dieing in a middle of a battle.

1 SNAC would use 51-60% of maximum energy so it takes about 1-3 seconds for it to recharge.

And I was thinking about the agility of a armored transport. I dodged a hacker's snacs from magellan to new york JG in california in one of those so it should be enough (he didn't hit me once). Maybe a little better agility if that hacker was a noob or somethin.

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Speakeasy
05-16-2010, 10:09 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 28
Threads: 3
Joined: May 2010

But.... My three torps Q_Q

It would be so much better than being able to almost dual fire SNACs. Either works though in the end.

Q: Is this going to be civilian or what?

[Image: neap00.jpg]
Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-17-2010, 07:03 AM,
#37
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

Well it's a tactical bomber so I'm afraid it would be strictly military...of course there could be some RP stories that would allow it to evolve into civi. However that seems highly unlikely. But the first of these vessels will be in the Order. Since that is what it was meant to be.

And the dual SNAC thing is still negotiable...It could fire dual SNACs if most agree on that.

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Cosmos
05-18-2010, 02:07 AM,
#38
Member
Posts: 1,208
Threads: 60
Joined: Apr 2008

meh more factionised ships.

We need more Civilian ships!

THE WARAN IS SUX! WE NOT WANT!

[Image: .png]
[22:50:33] ☆ҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳEternal†Nightmareҳ̸̲Ҳ̸ҳ☆(illi): i cyber with leather torps (smoking)
  Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-19-2010, 06:43 AM,
#39
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

Well we could RP that we sold the design to the Zoners and then they can make something out of it, but that's out of my league..

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Offline ErikssonJeny
05-23-2010, 08:46 AM,
#40
Member
Posts: 446
Threads: 30
Joined: Feb 2009

I tried to texture it but it does seem that some of the faces I've done are black even when textured. Here's the biggest of the all:

[Image: faceproblem.jpg]

Except for this one there's one on top and there's several on the thruster pods and I don't know how to fix it...

Could anybody suggest me what do do here?

"When you get the money, you get the power. When you get the power, you get the women."
-by Tony Montana

[Image: Eriksson.gif]
  Reply  
Pages (5): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode