[color=#3333FF]OLOL DELETE ALL BHG SHIPS j/k (dash)
I like that Mako type 3 thing. it looks just like the thing we have now, only more detailed. besides the bottlenose, and maybe a few tweaks on the bullhead, I think the ships are fine when not looking at level of detail. the head of it is too big for my liking, or the rest just too small
that new orca, I see no gunboat in it. more like a massive bomber, nothing like a gunboat. aren't gunboats supposed to be long, stretchy ships?
and as I don't fly caps or study them, I can only say I dislike the look of the future Bullhead and Mako when purely looking at my opinion of beauty. I hate boxy things
Ive revised my opinion a bit since my first post, the ships have grown on me a bit.
Posting as a BHG| GM
Orca: I did originally think it may have looked a bit too much like the Bottlenose, but if I see it as an upgrade instead of a different class of ship then it fits in very well.
Bullhead: Looks more like en early rough draught Thresher. Appears too short compared to the current one. The toughness of the ship is alright, and it does have a lot less windows but it is too boxy. Needs a bit of work, more length and less boxyness.
Mako mk II: looks better than when I first saw it, but i much prefer the mk III
Mako mk III: The best mako Ive seen so far. Ignoring the graphical errors from milkshape, I like the shape most. Nose heavier, tough slightly streamlined curves
' Wrote:Come on, everyone!
Hark, the Bounty Hunters si-ing,
Death to all the pirate kings...
Goals: To be interviewed by Chris Hansen on Dateline NBC.
by when I look at the vanilla gunboats. the RM GB, LN GB, Bret GB and Kusari GB are all long/tall if not stretchy in the Bret GB's case. the new orca is just a thin ball. even the bottlenose is tall enough for my liking