Sorry I have not posted earlier but I have not read the forums for a few days.
Ok now to go the opposite way and be SF centric, I personaly think that the SF tag should be kept in some way as there is an extreamly large amount of history behind it (once asked Lancer about it and took him over an hour to explain) aswell as being one of the oldest factions here.
Though that is probaly only my opinion and no one else will agree but I am just attached as I joined the SF on my first day here and have always been a part of it for my 2 years of playing discovery.
Also as to not using the second part of the name (the one for ship class), yes it is true it puts us at a disadvantage when people use it so they can bring ships that work well against ours but I do like using them as it can also work the other way where people bring ships to make the fight a good balance rather than bringing a battleship to take on 2 fighters. (though we seem to lack people who like fair fights these days)
As to making everyone have a Hussar and a Templar I do agree that everyone should have a Hussar or a Templar but I feel it is rather unfair to make people have both as to be honest if I had a Hussar it would only get used to make sure it does not get removed in a player wipe as it is a really sad light fighter (but I wont go down that road in this thread)
Kiggles:mellow:
I've been mildly miffed by one-shot weapons since their implementation, oh so long ago. I remember the days when fights were a matter of who could aim better, rather than who could aim a single shot. - Virus