Proposal: ID changes for 4.87

[Karst]

I like this a lot; more variety for all IDs? Yes please.

There are many things I noticed, most of which I can't remember, but let's see.....

About ZOI: The whole concept is a bit confusing, if you ask me. What exactly does ZOI actually mean?

Does it mean the faction ID can't leave those systems? In some cases, it obviously does (house police), while in other cases it clearly doesn't (corporate IDs).
I don't know if this should be explained on the IDs themselves, but it needs to be clarified somewhere.

- Freelancers can fly Pilgrim Liner / Ptrain, and Pirates can fly Pilgrim Liners? YES; YES, OH GOD YES.

- Junker ID: It mentions that they "Cannot participate in unlawful actions within house space, except in Kusari and Gallia."
However, it no longer has the line "May engage in piracy". So the way it's worded now, it doesn't allow piracy.
So which unlawful actions exactly are permitted? Or is this an oversight?

- DSE and IC ID: Why can they hunt Lane Hackers, but not Rogues or Xenos?
Ageira are the Lane Hackers' arch enemy, so it makes sense for them to be able to hunt each other.
But as far as I know, Lane Hackers are no more hostile towards DSE and IC than Rogues or Xenos are, and vice versa.

- All corporate IDs: They can defend a base "of the same affiliation", but not an allied base. Would make sense in my opinion if, say, a Bowex ship could defend a BMM base.

- Gaian ID: I suggest changing "Cannot attack Gallic Royal Navy." to "May only attack Gallic Royal Navy in self-defense."

- To Jack: You make it sound as if 6.6 is being removed entirely and pirates can generally treat transports as combat targets.
But it's only in very specific cases, cases in which it simply doesn't make sense to issue a demand.
It makes no sense whatsoever for a Blood Dragon to make a demand of a Samura vessel instead of blowing it up.

- Regarding rephacking the Pirate ID to undockable on unlawful bases:
This is problematic for a number of reasons.
Firstly, some unlawful factions (such as Rogues) are known to be very unfriendly toward independent pirates, but others are not and often accept their help.

This would also prevent Pirate ID'd ships from displaying an unlawful IFF - as in, an independent pirate that works primarily for / with unlawful faction x.

And lastly, gameplay reasons. Preventing independent pirates from docking on unlawful bases (as well as lawful ones) basically leaves them with Junker and Zoner bases.
This would mean in most places, they'd have to travel incredibly far between pirating spots and safe bases - not really a good thing for gameplay.

Official factions can already request nodock rephack for Pirate ID; there is no need to implement a blanket no dock for all unlawfuls.

Is that all? I think so.

---