(08-02-2013, 12:35 AM)El Commandante Wrote: Story seems like the sort of thing that should be done by committee.
Especially the conflict resolutions bit.
Trust me, bad idea.
Elucidate, please, Mon seignior.
I know some of the troubles surrounding typical commitee processes here on Disco (the ...sluggish pace of the Corsair Council and the old Molly Council certainly comes to mind), and i've heard complaints about how admining works-ish, but wouldn't it be far more appropriate to distibute the important, game-changing bits? Or else shall we simply end up with another 4.86 smuggling whatchamabob?
gawd the words are not with me tonight.
EDIT: and stop editing your edits, man, there are children present!
Edit of an Edit: I misspelled edit.
The Edit of the Previous Edit that Was Also Edited: I give up now. Carry on.
The person doing it should be taking from community rp, but there needs to be an organizational aspect to the connections that is better mapped by a single vision and not by a hodgepodge of different visions.
This is a situation for the old adage, "Too many cooks ruins the stew." You get a disconnected story, which ends up creating glaring contradictions. Not that the person doing it shouldn't look to others for feedback, but the overall vision should come from one person.