To: Owners of 'Poena Outpost'

[Tigger]

Encrypted:

CC: IND Headquarters
IND Corporate Legal Department, Liberty
Blackport 66 management

Note: Part 1 of a multipart document


Mr. Hawthorne,

Thank you very much for your response. I'd also like to thank you for the correction to commander rather than commodore in regards to Mr. Graham. I'm sure you can understand that when someone simply identifies themselves with a rank and no affilliation other than LSF operations can be deemed more than a little bit confusing.

* Commander Graham did not identify himself as a member of the Liberty Navy Primary Fleet. His correspondence simply stated his presumed rank and began with LSF Operations. I'm sure you can see how confusing this would be to any recipient as an intelligence gathering agency is not one which would normally have jurisdiction in such matters such as declaring fines and such. Thus with Mr. Graham's failure to properly identify himself we had little choice but to demand proper idenfification and authority.

* As for the question regarding the payment address, that was a personal question, not one of the legal team. In my previous dealings with the governments of Bretonia, Kusari, and other entities the payment address is more specifically defined. For example BPA)Anvil for licensing payments in Bretonia. Thus, once again, the sender failing to identify himself clearly led to question of each portion of the message.

* In regards to "legal threats" there have been none whatsoever. Seeking an injunction against action while facts are determined is a normal business procedure. Likewise a writ of habeus corpus to determine if any wrongdoing has been committed is also a normal proecedure which I'm sure you're familiar with. It's a determination of legal standing and clearly not a threat of any kind.


Brenda Carlisle
IND
Communications Director - Peona Outpost