(01-06-2016, 05:28 AM)LordVipex Wrote: Strange, I did not change anything in regards to field drain. It should still be off if it was before. I'll look into it.
//edit2: I've made the necessary changes to the fieldlines that makes sure that drain is not going to be a problem anymore. Might take a day or two to come online.
Great! Thank you.
(01-06-2016, 05:28 AM)LordVipex Wrote: Field positions is one of the things I will adress next. I should probably make a roadmap post in that regard.
> Tau 23: Would be cool if all the fields (Berryl & Niobium) were where now the 3 little Niobium fields are. That's 25-30k from Java and the Gallic BS. GMS and IMG miners could be there. Would help to create a "hot spot", far enough away from Cali (Outcast, 50-60k I guess). 2 larger fields (1 Niob, 1 Berryl) would be appreciated bc GMS and IMG would likely not cuddle while mining.
Reasoning: concentrating "prey" in one area will make Taus go live again. Unlawful selling points make cargo piracy against miners (mine for me or die!) a viable thing, and 2 lawful factions could respond (GRN/IMG) to OC activities. Also separating GMS and IMG by putting them on 2 opposite sides of the map is unnecessary and only dilutes action. Fairnesswise, distances to dockable base are the same for GMS and IMG.
