(09-20-2018, 06:17 AM)GrnRaptor Wrote: You're misunderstanding what the Treaty of Curacao's free trade clause is about. It's about not stopping trade through Magellan/Cortez, not granting everyone access to everything. LibLaw takes precedence inside Liberty, and if LibGov says that Crayter ships are considered military vessels (which they have here and here), then LibLaw in Liberty says no to CR transports until that stance is changed. With the IFF issue, which was apparently the primary reason this started, resolved, then an adjustment to that stance is both reasonable and feasible. =CR= continuing to push into Liberty with ships that they've expressly been told that they're not to do at current however is also not acceptable.
I said the exact same thing regarding the jurisdiction clause yesterday, but the real issue is that people believe that the treaty extends into the territory of both houses and thus grants full and free trade as is expressed in the treaty. What needs to happen is that people need to stop whinging in this thread and petition lib-gov to amend the treaty with a predefined jurisdiction for which all provisions will be binding upon. Once that's done this entire issue goes out the window because the treaty will apply to its two cited systems and house laws will be applicable whereever else that's appropriate.