Core| - The Core Feedback and Announcement Thread

[Spectre]

This is why nobody should be in control of an NPC base, not to mention multiple ones. Now we have these two children screaming at each other about which toy belongs to whom. It also explains why faction progression is stagnant (as you say): It's because none of you is willing to give up an asset because it would be a "victory" for the other. Roleplay is all about giving and taking, you two only want to take and obviously that leads to stagnation and dispute.

I will note here that I personally wouldn't mind Order losing Dabadoru if it means that there's both a) an event to coincide with it (easy to do) and b) an event where the Order tries for Capetown as recompense.
If those can be done, then I'm all for losing Dabadoru.

Also gonna point out here that for the entirety of |O|'s officialdom, we've docked primarily on Dabadoru to respect the Zoners' no-fire-zones. Just food for thought.

---

#BringBackTheCommonwealth

=CR=-----IN|G
----
A plurality is not a majority, and a majority is not everybody.

---

Spec's RP Consortium
V-3X | CV-Montu | Fort Murray
Unum pro Omnibus, Omnes pro Uno

Your signature grew too big, I helped downscale it. ~Vex
Your adjustment grew too big, I helped downscale it. ~Spectre