(05-18-2020, 06:12 PM)Shiki Wrote: (05-18-2020, 06:10 PM)Michael Echo Wrote: (05-18-2020, 06:05 PM)Tiger Wrote: Guard IFFs should stay. For example, you have secret facilities of, idk, RM, that are not accessible to the public eye. If youre friendly with the 'front view' assets of the RM, that doesnt mean they will allow you on their secret installations just like that. My points is, Guard IFFs have a role. And they need to remain. +1 If you think that some areas should be restricted then log in-game and enforce it instead of using outdated relic mechanics? That makes more sense.
(05-18-2020, 06:10 PM)Michael Echo Wrote: (05-18-2020, 06:05 PM)Tiger Wrote: Guard IFFs should stay. For example, you have secret facilities of, idk, RM, that are not accessible to the public eye. If youre friendly with the 'front view' assets of the RM, that doesnt mean they will allow you on their secret installations just like that. My points is, Guard IFFs have a role. And they need to remain. +1
(05-18-2020, 06:05 PM)Tiger Wrote: Guard IFFs should stay. For example, you have secret facilities of, idk, RM, that are not accessible to the public eye. If youre friendly with the 'front view' assets of the RM, that doesnt mean they will allow you on their secret installations just like that. My points is, Guard IFFs have a role. And they need to remain.