' Wrote:I didn't realize that dares were considered feedback.
1. No. I don't have anything to prove to you.
2. Sure, we do that. Going to insta-dock on a station makes it sort of hard to do that.
3. They sure exist. But you Junkers kept insulting us, so we're killing the lot of you, at the moment. How many times have we been attacked by Junkers for no reason? Way too often. (And insulting the Hellbound? Tsk, tsk.)
1. Why so <strike>serious</strike> defensive? I am sure that many other people would like to see the Phantoms judged by the same standards that we have today, standards which didn't quite exist when the faction was formed.
2. Actually, I didn't insta-dock. I actually waited to see just what Valentine would say next. I placed myself next to the station because I knew what was coming. That being three lines of dialog and explody fun.
3. I have never attacked any Phantom nor know of any other Junker that did. Mind showing some proof on that?
' Wrote:Aj we're are terrorists, what does that mean to you? To us it means spreading terror amongst our enemies. We're not going to spend twenty minutes talking to you whilst you call in friends to help. We're going to kill you and get out of there, move to a safe location and preach our message of hate and vileness unless we have another target that needs removing first.
Should we write a story for you? No. Of course we shouldn't. It doesn't fit. We're a small outfit, we have goals that need meeting. You see a Phantom you should be running, simple. Fear is a weapon. You dock we win, you die we win, you run from us screaming we win.
As for Junker hating? Lolwut? Can't think of any of us who hate the Junkers for being Junkers, as Phantoms we hate you for being the vile dancing puppets of the Houses, and for being utterly disrespectful of someone who can gun you down wherever you go.
You may be terrorists, but this is a roleplay server in a game. What you consider terrorism translates into nothing more than blatant PvP whoring in ingame actions. Funnily enough, every single other terrorist that I have met doesn't suffer from this problem. They are all able to speak with their mouths instead of their guns. In which way are the Phantoms any different from the other terrorists, especially a difference so big that gives them free permit to behave like they do?
As for the Junker hating I have never seen specified in any Phantom document (not like there are many around, but still) that you are explicitly hostile to Junkers. Also, there have been a few occasions in which I have seen Phantoms docking in Junker bases, Rochester and Beaumont to be more precise. So, where do you stand? Or does your secrecy RP not allow you to disclose why you are doing that?
@Zelot: When you know for a fact that the person that you just glanced is going to to tear you to pieces before you can even finish writing a sentence, you don't exactly sit around and wait for them to pop you either.
About the list: Point 1: Yes, indeed I do think that all factions that weren't judged by the current criteria should be re-evaluated. Point 2: Already explained to Del. Point 3: By non-Junker hater, I mean characters ( note, characters, not people. I'm not even putting that in the mix.) that as soon as they see a Junker don't want to make him go boom.
PS: Amazingly enough, I have seen no insults... yet.