Should fighters have their armor reduced?

[Govedo13]

Comments by people who can't PvP and therefor have an inaccurate view on the whole matter of balance. *sigh*

eg: It's not that my bomber is so much "better" than your fighter, it's that you just -suck- in you fighter, and I take advantage of that.
@Govedo13: On the Bounty Board you're seeing pro's poppin noobs. Not a good way to say that a bomber is better than a VHF. That's just proving that a skilled pilot is better than an idiot-jousting-pilot... For the most part.

Exactly what I am saying actually, however in 70% of the cases since the most fighter pilots are bad the bomber is indeed better, in the rest 30% when the fighter pilots can fly a fighter bomber looses.
My point was that the balance should be made towards all players not the ones that are pros- that's why I see the bot/bat discussion pointless from PvP point of view and I propose DPS/ projective speed discussion instead.

---

€œ

Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)