1. "If TAZ exists, this breaks the original premise of the existence of being permanent, as permanence is the Yin to the Yang of temporariness."
No, it is not. A state of temporarity does not have to be made temporary by transformation into permanency. It goes from one temporary state into another temporary state. One temporary state is the Ying, and another temporary state is the Yang, if you will.
2. "The one exists as the opposite to the other, like good and evil. There can be no evil without good and hence no state of being temporary without there also being a state of permanence. "
There can be evil without good, and there can be good without evil. Who gives you these crazy ideas?
There can be temporary states without there having to be a permanent state. There cant be a single temporary state without it being permanent.
3 "TAZ has been autonomous for a period of time longer than what can be considered 'temporary' and thus entered the realm of being permanently autonomous in its leadership. Thus, PAZ, has by the degree of legitimate concern, voiced through the epochs of thought and debate, become a reality."
You can only say it is or was permanenty autonomous once you can exclude the possibility that it will become non autonomous in future. The only way you can exclude that, is if its existence ends. If its existence ends, it was not permanent. Thus, it can only be temporary.