(05-12-2018, 12:02 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: It's odd that you include BAF and CR in the list of siege participants when they haven't responded to your comm. I wouldn't imagine that you speak for them. Isn't this jumping the gun quite a bit?
It's strange that you write in the faction information when there is a thread for the feedback in its signature.
We just warned of our intention to attack and asked for help. Thus, those who wish can come and help.
User was banned for: Really, Mike? Didn't you remember you were banned?
Time left: (Permanent)
Do you not think it's cheesy on the min/max side of things to declare a siege, and include participants that haven't even expressed their interest, just so that simply when the attack becomes valid you can all conveniently attack it?
(05-12-2018, 12:12 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Do you not think it's cheesy on the min/max side of things to declare a siege, and include participants that haven't even expressed their interest, just so that simply when the attack becomes valid you can all conveniently attack it?
I think that you are right.
Write in the faction's feedback, but not here.
User was banned for: Really, Mike? Didn't you remember you were banned?
Time left: (Permanent)
![[Image: Lythrilux.gif]](https://sig.grumpybumpers.com/host/Lythrilux.gif)