• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 385 386 387 388 389 … 546 Next »
revised model

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
revised model
Offline n00bl3t
06-27-2009, 11:13 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:- BHG battlecruiser ( i m not at all too happy with how it turned out - and somehow its too different to the "hunchbacked" rest of the line )

I like it as it is. What changes did you have in mind?

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline Jinx
06-27-2009, 11:21 AM,
#12
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

mostly - less windows. - compared with the battleship and the destroyer - it looks like a liner. - it has at least 8 decks .. and is littered with windows.

also - its a bit blocky while not meant to be. ( the destroyer is angular, too - but its meant to be like that ) - the battlecruiser is rather meant to follow the smoother lines of the battleship.

so - plans for the BC are to reduce the windows, giving it a more military like look - and to smoothen and reproportion it a bit.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
06-27-2009, 11:27 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

' Wrote:mostly - less windows. - compared with the battleship and the destroyer - it looks like a liner. - it has at least 8 decks .. and is littered with windows.

also - its a bit blocky while not meant to be. ( the destroyer is angular, too - but its meant to be like that ) - the battlecruiser is rather meant to follow the smoother lines of the battleship.

so - plans for the BC are to reduce the windows, giving it a more military like look - and to smoothen and reproportion it a bit.

XD.

I bought it for the windows. However, yes, I agree, it looks like a liner. (I also bought it because of the satellite dishes and the fact that it can fire 3 LM's, but that is irrelevant.)


[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline schlurbi
06-27-2009, 01:00 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 4,688
Threads: 187
Joined: Apr 2009

' Wrote:other ships i like to revise:


- mastodon - cause it was mentioned that it has bugs

- bretonian train... ppl weren t too happy with it from the very start

- bretonian container transport .... mostly gonne add more details and clean the model - i have examined the model and it contains tons of polygons that are simply pointless.

Dont redo the Bretonia Train. Please. It's already epic enough. I love the Train. But please remake the 'Handbag' Shire. But let the 12 Turrets ><.

As i posted in the other topic the Mastodon just has a few little problems.

And the Carrier looks really awesome. Nice work.

"Who is it doing this synthetic type of alpha beta psychedelic funkin'?"
[Image: Newgoldensigfinishawesomecoolcolours.png]
  Reply  
Offline teschy
06-27-2009, 01:29 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 2,470
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

I would like to see an upscale version of the Mammoth, with a 3000 hold. Basically, a Liberty version of the Behemoth statswise. I mean, the current Mammoth, even though it's only like 10 millions, is very weak and the 2200 cargo hold doesn't help. It also looks like an unfinished model, with those grey ugly textures on it.
Reply  
Offline Tommeh
06-27-2009, 02:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 02:26 PM by Tommeh.)
#16
Member
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2009

looks good,much stronger.I was thinking,maybe we should rename it to battlecruiser or something.Because in future Order probably will operate from one system and there won't be need for carrier.
And now everyone are getting it because it's cheap light BS,and it's huge oorp when there is 4,5 carriers in Minor and using them like they are ultimate battle ships not carriers.
just an idea

[Image: final3.png]
Reply  
Offline Inconcessus
06-27-2009, 04:18 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 04:31 PM by Inconcessus.)
#17
Member
Posts: 64
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2008

The old Geb model weren't bad either, but this new one is even better, I might even get one just to watch it in turret view... well *khm* sorry I was thinking loud, wasn't I ? I agree with what Tommy mentoned, but that is not related to how a model looks I guess.

I can't wait to see the rest of the revised models.





Edit: the never ending fight with typos

I like RP, where R stays for Role, not Retard.
Reply  
Offline Tommeh
06-27-2009, 07:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 07:31 PM by Tommeh.)
#18
Member
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2009

Well,partly it is connected,because now looks more battleing ship then carrier.
But I am going slowly in offtopic,so I will stop.

[Image: final3.png]
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
06-27-2009, 08:39 PM,
#19
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

Quote:I would like to see an upscale version of the Mammoth, with a 3000 hold. Basically, a Liberty version of the Behemoth statswise. I mean, the current Mammoth, even though it's only like 10 millions, is very weak and the 2200 cargo hold doesn't help. It also looks like an unfinished model, with those grey ugly textures on it.

We have one, it's called the mastadon.

Quote:looks good,much stronger.I was thinking,maybe we should rename it to battlecruiser or something.Because in future Order probably will operate from one system and there won't be need for carrier.

Um... tommy, I dont think you understand how our carriers are used. Right now the order operates with only two base systems (minor and 100), yet we have to fight enemies all across Sirius, in every house, and throughout the borderworld systems.

The Carrier works as a mobile base for the Order, allowing the faction to operate fighters and bombers anywhere in sirius that they are needed.

Quote:And now everyone are getting it because it's cheap light BS,and it's huge oorp when there is 4,5 carriers in Minor and using them like they are ultimate battle ships not carriers.
just an idea

The Order LC is the most expensive battlecruiser in the game, and it's really designed more as a light battleship than a heavy cruiser. Still, the carrier cannot go 1v1 against any battleship in disco, even the weakest battleships.

Quote:Well,partly it is connected,because now looks more battleing ship then carrier.
But I am going slowly in offtopic,so I will stop.

It has four fighter launch tubes on the front, how does that look like a battleship? =P

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline Tommeh
06-27-2009, 09:10 PM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 09:11 PM by Tommeh.)
#20
Member
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2009

' Wrote:We have one, it's called the mastadon.
Um... tommy, I dont think you understand how our carriers are used. Right now the order operates with only two base systems (minor and 100), yet we have to fight enemies all across Sirius, in every house, and throughout the borderworld systems.

The Carrier works as a mobile base for the Order, allowing the faction to operate fighters and bombers anywhere in sirius that they are needed.
The Order LC is the most expensive battlecruiser in the game, and it's really designed more as a light battleship than a heavy cruiser. Still, the carrier cannot go 1v1 against any battleship in disco, even the weakest battleships.
It has four fighter launch tubes on the front, how does that look like a battleship? =P
Ermm,Tenacity you have arguments against all my statements,some pretty good must say.:wacko:
for launch tubes,they can be fixed,but that's not my point.

My point was that maybe Order should get some battlecruiser,and I liked this design.if you ignore launch tubes(I know,Order got lot's of new ships already).
Just all those carriers in Minor are really oorp,because almost no one RP's with them as they are carriers.Actually they don't RP even like cap ship.
And everyone are using it as battlecruiser.

[Image: final3.png]
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode