Percentage Ambient Damage

[Varok]

This is stupid

/signed
This idea has no sense. As Lunaphase said, bigger ships got better protection. Implementing this would result epic fail.

[JIVA]

i don t think its possible to do anything but absolute damage anyway to ships.

a certain vulnerability to gasclouds would be fine for large ships - and actually does happen. - if disco capital ships ( civilian and military ) still had no shields - flying through a dangerous minefield or gaspockets would damage the subsystems severely.

but that takes us to the nasty problem of shaking capital ships without shields.

---

the [JIVA] group

[tansytansey]

Flying a capital ship would become even more expensive... especially if it did percentage damage to your equipment as well.

---

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.

[Sabre120]

I'm all for Bumping up the Light Fighter, Heavy fighter and possibly Very Heavy Fighters resistance to Radiation and mine damage, and making it a bit more hazardous for transports and maybe gunboats, but Cap ships should remain where they are as they are expected to have shielding and Radiation resistance plating.

---

Dream Theater - "Sabre120 and Jongleur officially win. That is all."