I think Curios has a point. Though I have no proof of anyone doing what Curios's post described, since someone's brought it up in public discussion that wasn't me (q_q nobody listens to kaiwren, whine whine etc etc), I think I'll start recording posts in threads that could arbitrarily be deemed as "controversial." (A sort of "internet copwatch," in a fashion, yes?)
' Wrote:The issue here was a slurry of OORP-only posts. We generally do clear those out on sight. Zelot's post has as well been invised, as it shouldn't have been made or left visible in the first place.
Indeed, I don't see any abusing of powers going on here, just some bad choices in regards to OoRP posts.
I'm willing to move Nozaki's transmission to the Council to a separate thread. The message clearly stated that no replies would be received. I, as a player, like to keep these transmissions together, especially when it is in direct response to original transmission, but those are my rules, not yours. Sorry to offend.
' Wrote:Okay, while you'r at it, i want to rise the problem of moderators closing\invising\deleting posts in comm threads they don't want there and thus abusing ooc powers in RP zone.
' Wrote:Indeed, I don't see any abusing of powers going on here, just some bad choices in regards to OoRP posts.
Then you missed the "ooRP" message from RF, that was relaying on an "ooRP" message from SCRA. I mean, after they were both got invs'ed, I wouldn't expect lot of people to know about it.