I can understand that it's kinda a discovery policy.
But people being butt hurt that there are other people who can pay for the game is quite a pethetic view. That includes ppl who answered NO as some kind of general and undenyable truth.
' Wrote:I can understand that it's kinda a discovery policy.
But people being butt hurt that there are other people who can pay for the game is quite a pethetic view. That includes ppl who answered NO as some kind of general and undenyable truth.
So, your personal opinion is 'undenyable truth'? Interesting.
' Wrote:So, your personal opinion is 'undenyable truth'? Interesting.
My personal opinion was backed up and not presented as some sort of axiom. So yeah, until it's not falsified it can be concidered truth. Happy?
Paying money to avoid grind is totaly fair, you can achieve same without em too.. I don't see any problem with it. Some people rather play games, others work. Being jelous on others that they can spent money on 2nd concern matters has nothing to do with the game.
I'm not saying this game needs rewards for donations. I'm only remarking on people who invaluate facts a bit wrong.
i Like the Idea , and if you guys think that it give lot of advantage who have lot of real möney to donate then why dont we put some Restrictions , like limit to maximum donation and number of time anyone can donate in a period . Yes its good idea , it give lots of incentives to server keep running and more player slots ,upgrading server and many more.:D
Why should you be Able to buy an advantage. It's would be unfair to allowpeople that can't afford stuff be without a chance. Lolwuts would buy as much as they could get, and it would only result in more battleships. The only thing keeping the rus people from getting battleships is the effort it takes to get it. Not to mention, when someone gets a ship jailed, they could just be like: 'lol whateva, Mesa buy a new one'.
' Wrote:Why should you be Able to buy an advantage. It's would be unfair to allowpeople that can't afford stuff be without a chance. Lolwuts would buy as much as they could get, and it would only result in more battleships. The only thing keeping the rus people from getting battleships is the effort it takes to get it. Not to mention, when someone gets a ship jailed, they could just be like: 'lol whateva, Mesa buy a new one'.
They will still get it. There is no actuall advantage over others except for the one that you don't need to spent time on something you do not prefer to spent time on. Then it comes to actuall competition both can have same equipment. Now if for money players could get premium stuff.. this would be a problem. But then with reasonable effort everything is achievable to both parties fairness doesn't really get hurt.
Except for funds which later can be used to uprgrade game itself. In most cases people playing free games with donation ability forgets that if not the people who are donating or buying stuff they wouldn't play the game at all.
If the product received is something anyone can get even if they didn't pay cash then the "pay to win" (wow internet is full of silliness) argument has no weight. It's not possible to win with any current product. If it was to get things that others can't that provide an edge, admin cannons being an extreme example, then it's a serious problem. When it's just the same old things we all can get all the cash does is exempt the fella from having to do the grind. My personal objection to this is that the foundation Disco's chain of activity is based on people doing the grind. Beyond that, bitching about someone being able to use $20 to purchase a BS that we all can get for free is hollow.
![[Image: Nope.gif]](http://images.encyclopediadramatica.ch/8/8c/Nope.gif)
![[Image: 36732.png]](http://internetometer.com/image/36732.png)
![[Image: GMG_banner.png]](http://i319.photobucket.com/albums/mm447/ProwlerPC/GMG%20RP/GMG_banner.png)
