• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 45 46 47 48 49 … 55 Next »
Weapon balance proposal

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do you agree with this proposal?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
77.12%
91 77.12%
No
22.88%
27 22.88%
0%
0 0%
Total 118 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (17): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 17 Next »
Weapon balance proposal
Offline chopper
03-06-2008, 05:20 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-06-2008, 05:21 PM by chopper.)
#21
Member
Posts: 2,476
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2007

McNeo, I didn't want to improve Hessian weapons further, as they are the best of 5.88 weapons.

Here is the stats for Natterturn Zwei :

Hull Damage - 314
Shield Damage - 157
Power usage - 80
Energy efficiency - 3.85
Refire - 5.88
Speed - 750

If you compare it to Fury 5 for example, you'll see that it's more energy efficient + faster for 50.
Yes, a bit smaller damage, but it hits more often + uses less energy.
Also, Hessians fight RM a lot, so if Natteruns are to be improved, Hornvipers should be improved even more.
Because I think House weapon should always be better then a Pirate gun.
Also, Suncannon wasn't that bad, compared to Hornviper or Gaia's angel.
So, it got only a small boost, but good enough for GC to use it instead of Krakens.

And no, Death Hand isn't 5.88, it's 8.33.

Also, while Rogues have better laser weapons, they have the worst ships in game, which can't be said for the GMG (Taiidan bomber, Taiidan HF).

If anyone thinks that some weapons should be improved/nerfed, please post it, and give your reasons why you think that should be done.

I see 7 votes against, but I don't see a single reason written for such an opinion.
I'm not complaining, I would only like to see what I did wrong, so, please comment your votes.
Thank you.

Lucendez Wrote:
It is every Corsair's responsibility to die a beautiful death in defense of Crete, regardless of how OORP or how capwhoring the opposition is. Launch your fighter, joust the battlecruisers and die a beautiful death. Then, drink it down in the bar.

Can't let you bash folks in your sig Chopper-Del
  Reply  
Offline pipsqueak
03-06-2008, 05:26 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 970
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2007

Quote:Also, while Rogues have better laser weapons, they have the worst ships in game, which can't be said for the GMG (Taiidan bomber, Taiidan HF).

Agreed, but... what about Rogue allies? Imagine this on a LH (Slipstream)!!!Also rogues have access to OC ships.

[Image: pixresizeuo0.jpg]
Reply  
Offline chopper
03-06-2008, 05:33 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 2,476
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2007

That is exactly the point of this subject.
Rogues should use their own ships and their own weapons.
Same for Hackers. And that's what I'm trying to do with this proposal.

Lucendez Wrote:
It is every Corsair's responsibility to die a beautiful death in defense of Crete, regardless of how OORP or how capwhoring the opposition is. Launch your fighter, joust the battlecruisers and die a beautiful death. Then, drink it down in the bar.

Can't let you bash folks in your sig Chopper-Del
  Reply  
Offline Nevermore
03-06-2008, 05:53 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 146
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2007

Agree on most parts..
However, I think the Disinfector 3 would be a little overpowered, having an efficiency rating of nearly 5 and decent damage as well. All other 600 speed weapons have comparable damage output, but are significantly less efficient. Weapon range on 600 speed weapons are negligible in my opinion, you won't hit anything beyond 550m anyway.

But the Raven, sitting lonely on that placid bust, spoke only
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered; not a feather then he fluttered--
Till I scarcely more than muttered, "Other friends have flown before--
On the morrow he will leave me, as my Hopes have flown before."
<blockquote>Then the bird said, &quot;Nevermore.&quot;</blockquote>

<div align="right">[Image: 32771555wo0.gif]</div>
  Reply  
Offline chopper
03-06-2008, 06:26 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-06-2008, 06:28 PM by chopper.)
#25
Member
Posts: 2,476
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2007

You will hit, especially gunboats and bombers. Range is important against these ships.
Also, Disinfector is still weaker then Salamanca, though it shouldn't be.
600 speed is also a big minus. You will also see that I'v lowered it's efficiency a bit.
Also, look at the Brettonia guns. They have that Adv. Splitter with same damage, but 700 speed.
Yes, sure, it uses more energy, but Templar can shoot it as much as Chimaera can shoot Disinfectors.
So, Brets have kept their advantage in guns, while Kusari still have a ship advantage.

Lucendez Wrote:
It is every Corsair's responsibility to die a beautiful death in defense of Crete, regardless of how OORP or how capwhoring the opposition is. Launch your fighter, joust the battlecruisers and die a beautiful death. Then, drink it down in the bar.

Can't let you bash folks in your sig Chopper-Del
  Reply  
Offline mjolnir
03-06-2008, 08:12 PM,
#26
Member
Posts: 3,774
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Weapon range on 600 speed weapons are negligible in my opinion, you won't hit anything beyond 550m anyway.

Looks like nobody used it on you yet.... if you know what to do... especially against bombers and have guns with say 750m range.. you can make long joust turn.. fire two -three salvos at 750-550 then dodge for the rest of the pass.. then turn around. When you meet this tactic first time.. you can get a very nasty surprise... getting down to half hull before even taking his shield... and don't know why.

Also intercepting in TLs the 200m are often difference between disrupting the pirate/smuggler or his escape.

[Image: sigiw102.jpg]
Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.
Reply  
Offline Jinx
03-06-2008, 08:35 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-06-2008, 08:38 PM by Jinx.)
#27
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

from just reading it down - i have the feeling that some weapons might be too strong ( allthough you allready said it only appears like it - compared to the kraken 2 ) - - just a feeling.

i think for very big jumps upwards the damage ladder, the energy requirement should be slightly higher on some. maybe weapons should "pronounce" more what they are build for ... that is energy efficiency, damage, speed, range, etc.

so - i d like those weapons that say they are build with a range advantage to really have an advantage... let them have a range of 30 - 50% more compared to others. weapons with energy efficiency sometimes don t need an upgrade to the damage... just more efficiency ( there are no weapons around that you can permafire provided you put the max class into your weaponslots ).
weapons build around damage should really be like that - damaging ... and weapons with fast projectiles ... well, thats a point that is allready quite OK. - 500 speed to 750 / 800 is fine when it comes to a direct comparisson.

weapons you may like to consider, too are the fury 4 and 5 - both are lvl 9 zoner weapons and fairly inefficient ( comparable to the gaian weapons ) - but in that case it might be OK if the fury 4 was just classified as a lvl 8 weapon - fury 5 is fine.

if possible, i d love to see weapons having a great impact on the shields they hit. - so if a weapon is classified as being strong, it should not be the generic 20% damage more to a shield - but a good 50% ... while a weapon being weak should only do 50% of its initial damage ( i d love to have that changed )

other than that, it ll make fighterfights faster ( no idea how it affects fighting capital ships )

edit: damage is not everything ( or should not be ) -- weaponspeed and range should be as important when choosing a weapon as damage and refire. right now, its allmost all about damage and refire, projectile speed is very important, too - but range is allmost ignored for most. - but i am not sure what effect it might have if one weapons had a huge dps but a range of like 600, while another had a below average dps but a range of like 1200.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline chopper
03-06-2008, 09:14 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-06-2008, 10:36 PM by chopper.)
#28
Member
Posts: 2,476
Threads: 31
Joined: Oct 2007

Jinx, there are certain problems with "energy efficient" weapons.
First, take Salamanca for example. Yes, it uses less energy, but it hits twice as less then 700 speed weapons.
So, actually, it's not that efficient in real combat as it appears.
Same for disinfectors.

Imagine a gun with 200 speed, 1500 damage and 1 energy usage.
Energy efficiency can't bypass the fact that you can't hit with it.
I agree, if there were any ultra energy efficient weapons which speed is 700, they wouldn't need a damage upgrade.
I guess you meant on Salamanca's/Disinfectors when you said it, so, just to clarify a bit.

Salamanca got a damage upgrade, and it's energy efficiency is slightly decreased, just as you said it should be.
Why? Because Titan has an enormous power capacity, and doesn't really need so energy efficient weapon.
What it really needs is something that hurts.
So, as I said, while Salamanca is slightly more energy efficient then Kraken (in my proposal), it still has 600 speed, so it's still less efficient in reality - then Kraken.
Disinfector got an upgrade from totally different reasons.
It's a Navy weapons, and as I said, my opinion is such that Navy/Military guns should be stronger then they currently are.
Same upgrade goes to both Brettonian guns, both Rheinland guns and both Liberty guns.
So, it really has nothing to do with Salamanca.

Of course, you can make some suggestions about weapons, and I will more then gladly edit my post if they are reasonable.
There's no point for me to keep it as I think it should be, we all need to agree about numbers.
So, people, comment and leave your suggestions.

I agree with your 'range' proposal, but I have no idea if that is possible.
It would make fights against gunboats and bombers better, with more tactics for you to use.
In order for you to hit a fighter from 1200 range, you need a much better speed then 750.
750 works fine up to some 500-600m, on an average fighter.
Closer - better, of course.
But weapons with 1200 range and 600-750 speed could use that range only against bombers/capships

Lucendez Wrote:
It is every Corsair's responsibility to die a beautiful death in defense of Crete, regardless of how OORP or how capwhoring the opposition is. Launch your fighter, joust the battlecruisers and die a beautiful death. Then, drink it down in the bar.

Can't let you bash folks in your sig Chopper-Del
  Reply  
Offline El Nino
03-06-2008, 11:28 PM,
#29
Member
Posts: 1,248
Threads: 25
Joined: Dec 2007

Well seeing as most weapons get improved, why not just nerf some of the overpowered weapons, (krakens for example)....

I really like the idea of making lvl 10 weapon versions, that would reach the proposed levels...

Donate to the Poor Pilot's Fundation via Sirius Bank /givecash GreenHawk 1000000 now, and support poor pilots sirius wide!
Skype: jure.grbec
My primary char: Jose El Nino - Corsair Elder captain of the SS Greenhawk

Currently Inactive due to pursuit of life long dreams, will be back...*edited* As promised am back.

[Image: opgbar.gif][Image: rightbar.jpg]
[Image: Sungi_sig.png]
  Reply  
Offline mjolnir
03-07-2008, 01:47 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 3,774
Threads: 71
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Well seeing as most weapons get improved, why not just nerf some of the overpowered weapons, (krakens for example)....

Well because everyone would use codes/nomads.... or "allies" weapons ... hence Navy using Buckshots... for me that's worse that codes.. since codes are hard to aim.. Buckshots aren't.. same with Krakens. Even Nomads are much harder to aim than those two.

[Image: sigiw102.jpg]
Igiss says: Martin, you give them a finger, they bite off your arm.
Reply  
Pages (17): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 17 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode