Just a thought

[Stefz]

Prolly won't happen. Discovery isn't democracy and will never be.

---

[Zynth]

Should we vote? Yes.

Is it feasible? No.

Discovery isn't a democracy.

We might as well throw in a parliament with several ministries to boot such as "Ministry of SRP", "Ministry of Sanctions" and "Ministry of Ship Development".

---

[Tachyon]

This part of Discovery has justification to not be democratic.

---

[Fat.Igor]

I voted "no" because I dont want a popularity contest.

Also, the poll option explanations are a bit biased.

---

GUESS

WHO'S

BACK

!?!?!

[Loken]

I voted "no" because I dont want a popularity contest.

Also, the poll option explanations are a bit biased.

Not like it matters, it's a poll on a forum.

Plus it's a forum where a lot of us probably have access to at least 4 forum accounts.

---

[Roberto Cofresi]

Since I am fairly new pilot and still in the honey moon with FL and Disco. I vote no. Maybe in two or three years I'll change my mind.

---

[1tempus1]

Such a vote is quite useless, i have voted no.

Nothing will changed after that so why bother?

---

[center]

[/center]

[TheJarl]

Yes.

Can members not be trusted with that responsibility? Perhaps, but they are already pretty much being chosen by members. Just a smaller group of members, namely the admin team. But they are just as brilliant or stupid as the others.

---

[Othienka]

Funny how the "No"'s are explained as "nothing will change". So in other words, you are just voting yes, if there was a chance it actually became true.

[Battlesnax]

The forum community is not mature enough to handle voting for Administrators.
We would nominate whatever the 4Chan meme-of-the week was.
An Admin bench full of Nyan Cats and My Little Ponies? ... No thanks.

We may be ruled un-democratically by benevolent elites, but if it ain't broke don't fix it.
The Admins check each other to prevent abuse.
Who was the last corrupt/bad Admin we had?

---

Let's all just be friends and have a good time.