• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 166 167 168 169 170 546 Next »
A relatively simple way to reduce PVP time

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
A relatively simple way to reduce PVP time
Offline Veygaar
12-12-2012, 09:34 AM,
#21
Member
Posts: 4,211
Threads: 157
Joined: Jan 2011

If bot feeding is bad.... why do we have repair ships?

Veygaar for Admin Moderator 2013!!!
[Image: tumblr_mhigevrWmO1qh09nho1_500.gif]
Reply  
Offline Ichiru
12-12-2012, 09:44 AM,
#22
Librelancer, LancerEdit
Posts: 811
Threads: 80
Joined: Oct 2011
Staff roles: Coding Dev

(12-12-2012, 09:34 AM)Veygaar Wrote: If bot feeding is bad.... why do we have repair ships?

Unkillable tradeships [Image: emoticon-00137-clapping.gif]

Acolyte of NoMe
  Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
12-12-2012, 09:57 AM,
#23
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Anything that helps to get rid of pvp funbreakers (like bot-feeding, npc-farming, dragging the fight out by having too many regens anyway) is heartily welcome from my side.

A first step would be to make NPCs drop no B&B any more.

If this doesn't need a FLHook, I would say let's do that for the new version. It has become a habit in Taus to shoot the 18 B&B NPCs in midfight and 18 bots means you fight for 5-10 minutes longer against a full dodge fighter. It's also regarded as a bad move.

In combination with nerfed NPCs (e.g. the IMG/OC NPCs in T23) NPCs will lose significance in pvp, which is exactly how it should be, imo.

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline Veygaar
12-12-2012, 10:00 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-12-2012, 10:04 AM by Veygaar.)
#24
Member
Posts: 4,211
Threads: 157
Joined: Jan 2011

(12-12-2012, 09:34 AM)Veygaar Wrote: If bot feeding is bad.... why do we have repair ships?

These things exist people, for anyone... Is feeding really PvP "funbreaking" or is it just smart fighting?

I'm not on either side, as I do think snub fights can go on to long sometimes, but other times I quite enjoy that so... idk, food for thought.

Bot feeding might be the great equalizer in a fight of noobs against pros... Who say's that the skilled guys always have to win?

Veygaar for Admin Moderator 2013!!!
[Image: tumblr_mhigevrWmO1qh09nho1_500.gif]
Reply  
Offline sindroms
12-12-2012, 10:01 AM,
#25
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

(12-12-2012, 09:44 AM)ichiru Wrote:
(12-12-2012, 09:34 AM)Veygaar Wrote: If bot feeding is bad.... why do we have repair ships?

Unkillable tradeships [Image: emoticon-00137-clapping.gif]

I use mine for code looting.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
12-12-2012, 01:45 PM,
#26
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

Repair ships really should do active repairs, but until this point were unable to do so. Come 4.87 we'll address that as well, by giving the damned things a "Repair Beam" and then reducing their B/B count by a factor of 20 or so. Had another though: It might be possible to declare bots and bats as mission cargo - if we do that, the game itself will prevent folk from trading the commodity, although it should remain usable. Combined with a "no drop on ship death" flag set, it'll lock B/Bs to the playership that carries them.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Offline Jack_Henderson
12-12-2012, 01:53 PM,
#27
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

(12-12-2012, 01:45 PM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: It might be possible to declare bots and bats as mission cargo - if we do that, the game itself will prevent folk from trading the commodity, although it should remain usable. Combined with a "no drop on ship death" flag set, it'll lock B/Bs to the playership that carries them.

Yes, please.

I can see quite some bad elements that spoil the fun in pvp disappear by something like that. No "give bots, then clandestinely run, resupply and rejoin" tactics, no "cloaky Ptrans/BS sitting somewhere doing it with zero risk" moves, no "early death by MR => + 15 mins fight", etc.

It would break the repairship until the new system (see AD's post) works, but - to be honest - sadly 100 % of repair ships that I have seen during the last 2 months were food for sanctions (mostly 6.9) or did things that I personally would label "lolwut??!!" or at least "not improving fun".

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
12-12-2012, 01:58 PM,
#28
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

Is it possible to make cap and snub bots and bats as different objects usable by their own class only?

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline Anaximander
12-12-2012, 02:06 PM,
#29
Member
Posts: 1,261
Threads: 62
Joined: Jun 2012

No AD wrote this in another thread:


(12-11-2012, 04:20 PM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: "My suggestion: Introduce CAP+TRANSPORT-regens and SNUB-regens. Snubs cannot be fed with cap regens and vice versa."
Not possible, techwise. It's possible to create regens with less or more capacity, but it's not possible to prevent certain craft from using them.
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
12-12-2012, 02:51 PM,
#30
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

(12-12-2012, 01:53 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: I can see quite some bad elements that spoil the fun in pvp disappear by something like that. No "give bots, then clandestinely run, resupply and rejoin" tactics, no "cloaky Ptrans/BS sitting somewhere doing it with zero risk" moves, no "early death by MR => + 15 mins fight", etc.

It would break the repairship until the new system (see AD's post) works, but - to be honest - sadly 100 % of repair ships that I have seen during the last 2 months were food for sanctions (mostly 6.9) or did things that I personally would label "lolwut??!!" or at least "not improving fun".

It would not fix someone disengaging from a fight, docking somewhere and having autobuy fully restock him/her, then rejoining the battle - as long as someone's out of range of the battle while docking. But that's at least a 15K cruise. Doing this requires touching the commodity files, which means at earliest this will be done in 4.87. If Blodo/Cannon want this done (I vaguely remember they did).

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode