• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 557 558 559 560 561 … 778 Next »
About the Number of Factions

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4
About the Number of Factions
Offline farmerman
04-13-2009, 06:02 PM,
#31
Off in space for a bit
Posts: 3,215
Threads: 162
Joined: Jul 2008

I support a review of official factions, especially those who have been here a long time. Or at least make it a requirement to have a feedback thread, which I don't think is the case (or am I just being confused today?).

At the least, for unofficial factions, I'd like if one of those random messages that pop up suggested registering unofficial factions so that people are able to contact them if there's an issue. That's the biggest complaint I hear about unofficial factions and indies - official factions are easy to get ahold of if there's an issue.

[Image: 4986_s.gif]
Faction info links: Samura Heavy Industries : LWB : Watchers
Reply  
Offline Thexare
04-13-2009, 06:06 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-13-2009, 06:10 PM by Thexare.)
#32
Ominously Humming
Posts: 3,821
Threads: 340
Joined: Apr 2008

' Wrote:Or at least make it a requirement to have a feedback thread, which I don't think is the case (or am I just being confused today?).
That wouldn't really fix it. Some people just don't listen to criticism well, including in official factions. Moreso those that have been around longer, it seems.

I am not talking about the QCP/AFA crap! Just making that clear.

EDIT: Removed part of the quote for clarity.
Reply  
Offline McNeo
04-13-2009, 06:08 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

Um... the Brotherhood recently decided to change its tag from

[+]Name

to

Name[TBH]

Any ships with the [+] tag should be in the process of renaming.

The [TBH] suffix tag was our original tag, I remember that we changed to [+] after we failed to use the other cross that more resembled our faction logo. We're going back to our roots right now, so we're taking up our old tag again.:cool:

On the topic at hand, I don't much see the point in limiting the number of unnofficial factions. They are generally composed of people who want to play the game their way, yeah, but lots of people want to play the game their own way. That way might not conform to the way that the overall faction is played or represented by the official wing of it.

Even if it were possible to do, I wouldn't support it. That said, I dont see many unnoficial Corsair factions that have managed to survive for more than a few weeks at most, so it might be because this doesnt affect my primary faction that much.

A review of all the official factions would be good though. Some may have slipped, whereas others may have dramatically improved. I want to see the results of a review, actually.
  Reply  
Offline pipboy
04-13-2009, 06:16 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 1,122
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:A review of all the official factions would be good though. Some may have slipped, whereas others may have dramatically improved. I want to see the results of a review, actually.

Agreed, I would love for something like that to happen. I don't know why any self respecting faction leader wouldn't.

[Image: harlcopy.png]
  Reply  
Camtheman Of Freelancer4Ever
04-13-2009, 06:20 PM,
#35
Unregistered
 

Noooo! My one man clan [ZF] will have to go then? XD :laugh: but we will get members hell or high water soon...
Reply  
Offline carlabrams
04-13-2009, 08:46 PM,
#36
Member
Posts: 339
Threads: 11
Joined: Sep 2008

The only issue I have with unofficial factions is simple.

You're WHO?

The alphabet soup can get confusing as all get out, especially with new and imported clans.

Sentient Machine Alliance
Reply  
Offline Linkus
04-13-2009, 10:33 PM,
#37
Member
Posts: 4,027
Threads: 155
Joined: Mar 2008

Simply put.

There is no other way without restricting the freedom that makes Discovery as good as it is.

If you restrict un-official factions, people will still band together but just won't use a tag.

So in essence, nothing will change except the tags in chat window.





Facilitating the rise of robotics since 0 A.D.
  Reply  
Offline SigCorps
04-14-2009, 02:39 AM,
#38
Member
Posts: 600
Threads: 35
Joined: Jul 2008

Actually I would love to see feed back on the Unofficial factions. Since I am trying to run one and eventually go official. Seems most folks around here do not care all that much about the unofficial ones. I have had an intent thread up for months and have gotten very few responces. Recruiting is not easy, but then again maybe my nitch for OSI is too small. Also timing it right before 4.85 came out was a bit of a bad idea. While I may not have to work as hard as some faction leaders I still have to do the upkeep, diplomacy, find new trade routs, test ships, ect, ect. It is still alot of work. Getting feed back on my ideas and how we are doing would be great.

As for Agmen's comment, yes there are a ton of unofficials out there and it is impossible to keep track of all of them. Could we perhaps get a forum where we can post our intent threads for feed back that is separate from general discussion? This was we can have all of them in one place? This would also give anyone looking for a faction only two places to look. The official recruitment thread and The unofficial faction threads? When a faction goes official their post in the unofficial forum could be deleted.

As for reviewing the official factions, well I think some of that is done already. Seeing those post from our Reverend about I need to see leaders for X, Y and Z factions. Or when an entire faction gets jailed if enough. If a faction is doing the right thing why should they come up for review?

[Image: SigCorps-Sig---small.gif]
[Image: Alaric-Sig001---Strip-1.gif]

Formerly Sam Nichols, creator of OSI
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode