• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 308 309 310 311 312 546 Next »
Stryker Fighter

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Stryker Fighter
Offline Dusty Lens
04-13-2010, 01:50 PM,
#31
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Can we get an in-game shot/size comparison?

A few images, or a video preferably, of the shape would be excellent. Chiefly due to some concern over a Falcattaish balloon/clay look that the model may possess.

That being said, if the model is actually found to be of higher quality, replacing a vessel like the cupholder... Which is essentially the exact same ship as this one save more primitive... Would strike me as a worthier move than replacing a perfectly fine vanilla model with a redundant fighter.
Reply  
Offline teschy
04-13-2010, 01:54 PM,
#32
Member
Posts: 2,471
Threads: 24
Joined: Jan 2007

' Wrote:As for making one a VHF and the other a HF... It is not logical since both ships have the same shape, size and gun points.

Isn't that how the current Avenger and Executioner are like? >_>
Reply  
Offline McNeo
04-13-2010, 02:04 PM,
#33
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

Navy spec ops uses golden ships.

Im probably the only one but Im sensing something not quite right with the model/texture. I think it might need a 'cleaner' texture if it stays as smooth as it is now.

Replacing the Avenger is also probably not a good idea.
What this -could- be however is the follow up non-defective model based on the Phantom VHF (formerly the LSF Ravenclaw).

But it would need Yue Fei's original clean black texture (with a few tweaks) for that, I think.
  Reply  
Offline Sturmwind
04-13-2010, 08:20 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 2,097
Threads: 146
Joined: Aug 2009

Would work as an LSF bomber, with the darker texture variation. I wouldn't like to see the current Upholder being replaced, personally.
Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-13-2010, 10:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-13-2010, 10:53 PM by Korolia.)
#35
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

To answer a few points;
-I might turn the LSF model so it only has one single vertical fin to make it different, it shouldn't be a very hard modification to the original.
-The textures used are vanilla defender texture, modified (LMC one uses a somewhat greyer one while LSF uses a black one.)
-Because I was asked only to texture the ship, I know not what would the stats be.
-I did considered it would be a fine replacement to redundant HF class fighters that nobody seems to use right now - replacing their stats and infocard shouldn't be very hard

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Offline tansytansey
04-14-2010, 01:36 AM,
#36
Member
Posts: 4,099
Threads: 67
Joined: Aug 2008

It looks too roundish for my tastes. Kind of like the sausage Falcata. The smoothness is also distorting the textures, giving it a rather ugly appearance. If you've applied smoothing or something to it, I'd recommend taking it off.

http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/vv46/Ni...gcloudscopy.png
Image turned into a URL because it made your sig too tall. -Zuke
|Ashes and Draya's Epic Adventure|Ashes "Nighthawk" Yotaka|Nightfall|Eva Jones|
[5:50:49 PM] JakeSG (William Darkmoor) says: I like you, Ashes. You're more cynical than God.
[Image: SLRU.png]
  Reply  
Offline Korolia
04-14-2010, 03:34 AM,
#37
Member
Posts: 357
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2010

Again, I did -not- do the model, only textured it.

[Image: PrincessSignaturecopy.png]
There is no bathroom!
  Reply  
Offline jimmy Patterson
04-14-2010, 03:58 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-14-2010, 03:59 AM by jimmy Patterson.)
#38
Member
Posts: 1,695
Threads: 45
Joined: Mar 2008

id say add it new as a fighter variant of the upholder maybe infocard it as a field modification like what was common with ww2 era soviet/British/German fighters that the corps/LSF adopted to better use the resources they have

[Image: 2emctxg.png]
kudos tommeh for sig
  Reply  
Offline Saronsen
04-14-2010, 04:05 AM, (This post was last modified: 04-14-2010, 04:06 AM by Saronsen.)
#39
Member
Posts: 1,687
Threads: 106
Joined: Mar 2009

FYI Yue Fei/Xing made that ship.

http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll166/e...nstitre-1-5.png

I'll say yes, Korolia did texture it though.
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
04-14-2010, 04:09 AM,
#40
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Ah HA

I knew I had seen that ship before.
Reply  
Pages (7): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode