BHG Bomber

[Cond0r]

Seeing as how I was bomberwhoring about 3 months ago, I would have to say that the BHG bomber is perfectly fine. Ye, it has a lighter plan, but its size/turning speed make up for it.

As I see it it fits in perfectly with the BH ship line. It can handle itself well enough against lolgates and lolsirises. Do NOT touch the Moray's, the bomber is perfectly fine.

But ADDING a heavy bomber is something I would support ye.

---

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo

[Stoat]

Hmmmm, gets a not necessary from me. What we've got is more than good enough.

---

My Stories

[SeaFalcon]

Well I like light and agile but the model sucks. So I can't really choose.
Maybe a second heavy 2torps 1 CD BHG bomber?

I do have a model in my head for a heavy bomber of the BHG but I can't model -.-

Something like a Manta but no chin and the 2 side wings stay
the same model as the side wing 1 on top and one under the cockpit facing forward.
Maybe make all wings thicker.
And 2 torp tubes inside the 2 side wings.

[Athenian]

The BHG already have a heavy bomber.

It's called the Bottlenose gunship.

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules

[Athenian]

Double post madness.

I dare the BHG|, who have two admins, to use FR5 and crush the player after the Outcast were told if they did the same to their players they'd have their official status removed.

How is the fact that a faction has Admins in it at all relevant?

Plus, I exist in the faction now purely as an extra ship for Liberty gank sessions.(edit: I may leave and try a closed economy hunter all by lonesome, just to see. Or a merc. Probably a merc. Or a Corsair. Or maybe a Zoner. Actually, not a Zoner.)

But I see your point. How anyone could consider the Corsairs anything other than plasma-fodder is certainly going to be hard for people to swallow. Me included. (They, yes you guessed it, killed my parents).

Diplomacy is always an odd thing. cf Stalin and Hitler, 1939. (Godwin's Law satisifed)

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules

[Cond0r]

The BHG already have a heavy bomber.

It's called the Bottlenose gunship.

You Sir are correct, and thou have won this thread. *bows*

---

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo

[Curios]

I have no problem with BHG bomber, but yea, it can't throw down the Trident that easy, but its ok.

Actually, an additional (Core-only) heavy BHG bomber would probably make sense.

Oh please, how many ships BHG is going to have.

Light fighter, Heavy, VH. Bomber. Gunboat. Gunship. Cruiser. Battlecruiser. Battleship.

And some people are still cry when someone is talking about Corsair\Outcast battlecruiser or whatnot.

---

[Athenian]

Oh please, how many ships BHG is going to have.

I would still like to see a Guild Armoured Personnel Carrier/ Prisoner Transport freighter. With Class 10 Battleship turrets. And lights. Lots of them.

---

Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules

[ArmsAndLegs Guy]

I would still like to see a Guild Armoured Personnel Carrier/ Prisoner Transport freighter. With Class 10 Battleship turrets. And lights. Lots of them.

Red lights.. And flames painted on the hull. It makes it go faster you know.

A & L Guy

---

Here to serve® You!!!

[Cond0r]

And we will name it BHG|Hollywood, as per aerelm's idea

---

[17:23:05] Mini Me: pls
[17:23:06] Mini Me: gtfo