Bonjour Matthew Harrison,
as IND had a permit in the distant past and no problems were encountered the current status of your application is shown below.
Please note: You must adhere to all appropriate laws and regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your permit
is being processed
is rejected
needs further information is approved and logged here.
We would like to request a change order to a base construction application, and move the proposed location to either:
Dauphine C-5
Languendoc F-4
Extra zoning onto Bourg-en-Bresse
In order to aid in clean up of scrap fields.
After discussion among our constituents, we have confirmed the location as an Annex to the Remoulins wreck, from which we will base clean up operations.
Bonjour again,
could I draw your attention to our previous reply, "is this pertaining to Le Havre Freeport"?
If not we need to know if this is a new proposed build.
With respect to location. It is true that annexing of an existing base is a potential however the site mentioned is problematic.
a) If the wreck is considered still a base it would still belong to GMS. Extensions to bases can only be carried out by the base owner at the time of extending the facilities.
b) If it is now not a base but a wreck then can I draw you to point 2 of the Base Regulations here.
Either way its current location is not within the permit regulations, consequently a relocation within that system is desirable to expedite the build.
The current status of your application is shown below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your permit
is being processed
is rejected needs further information
is approved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I apologize for missing the first section of your transmission. Yes this pertains to changing the proposed location of Le Havre Freeport, as we have deemed Leeds an unsafe location for scrapping operations. The change order referred to in previous messages implied a change requested to our permit for Le Havre Freeport. We wish to build the scrapping operation in Languendoc instead.
In regards to Remoulins itself, the station has been abandoned for nearly 7 years. We have already been taking part in clean up, launching patrols from Lodeve, but that is merely and outposts, and lacks proper facilities to process that volume scrap. I think Remoulins can be safely considered a wreck. I doubt refurbishing would even be possible
Bonjour again,
thank you for confirming that this does pertain to Le Havre Freeport, it is always preferable to have a solid basis rather than an implied situation, especially when property is involved.
As you are the experts in salvage we will take your word that the base is currently nor a viable rebuild option. That does however indicate that the base extension annex regulations do not apply.
This means we need to consider point 2 of the Base Regulations, here.
To comply with the base needs to be well out of the way of existing trade lanes, 10 K is the recommended minimum with 15 K being the regulatory distance if planning defence platforms.
If these constraints are agreeable then we should be able to expedite the build.
The current status of your application is shown below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your permit
is being processed
is rejected needs further information
is approved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Kingdom of Gallia
From: Johnny Smirnoff
Subject: Trading and Jump License
Encrypted: Medium
Priority: Medium
Guten Tag,
We want to improve trade relations with the Kingdom of Gallia. Commodity turnover volume plan is big , therefore we want use Jump Tec to move our ships to the Lyonnais system ( Montbrison Storage Facility and Roanne Production Facility ). Our hired jump-ships: UltraSonic, steamship, Talbot, Fochinit .
Also we pay for the trading license.
Bonjour Johnny Smirnoff ,
thank you for your communication.
Before we further process the permit could you please answer the following query.
If we understand you correctly you wish to jump four capital class ships into Gallia. This is highly irregular, have we misunderstood? As you will appreciate this number of offensive ships would be aslight worry to our populance.
The current status of your application is shown below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your permit
is being processed
is rejected needs further information
is approved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![[Image: 220px-Flag-gallia2.png]](http://discoverygc.com/wiki/images/thumb/f/f2/Flag-gallia2.png/220px-Flag-gallia2.png)
![[Image: P1IbPzQ.png]](http://i.imgur.com/P1IbPzQ.png)
![[Image: KkJsy8U.png]](http://i.imgur.com/KkJsy8U.png)
![[Image: RepublicanLogoInvert.png]](http://discoverygc.com/wiki/images/2/23/RepublicanLogoInvert.png)
![[Image: x5mp.jpg]](https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/330x63q90/32/x5mp.jpg)