• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 45 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 18 Next »
Developer Notice: Player Owned Bases Update
Offline Dead Reckoning
03-13-2014, 11:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-13-2014, 11:26 PM by Dead Reckoning.)
#101
Member
Posts: 137
Threads: 10
Joined: Jan 2013

(03-13-2014, 10:06 PM)spacedragon Wrote: ! - my base (core 4) seems to need TWO TIMES MORE Reinforced Alloy now (~6000 in ~8 hrs). - !

That's NOT -like promised- 2 TIMES EASIER TO SUPPLY BUT ALMOST 2 TIMES MORE WORK!


(It's also NOT REALLY 2 TIMES EASIER to supply a base, just because it needs half amount of RA, it will also need Food, Oxygen and Water!)

(03-13-2014, 10:18 PM)Kazinsal Wrote: Spacedragon, I will figure out what is with the repair functionality and get back to you.

Just my observation. Very, very crude measurements but they seem to indicate correctly:

Starting point was 3:58 PM local time
By 4:04 PM I had lost 38 RA
By 4:18 PM I had lost 112 RA

112 RA / 20 minutes = 5.6 RA per minute (crude measurements, remember) which is in line with 6 per minute since it eats 2 per 20 seconds. This was on a core 4.

EDIT: By crude measurements I mean occasionally looking up at an oven clock. So no seconds being accounted for.
Reply  
Offline Lumik
03-13-2014, 11:32 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-13-2014, 11:33 PM by Lumik.)
#102
Member
Posts: 366
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2011

(03-13-2014, 09:37 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: Core 4 in 1 hour ? Just disable the plugin - this is a joke, to get to core 4 you need a few months, when 10 bs can take it out in 1 hour, did i mention time zones? what a joke

(03-13-2014, 11:19 PM)spacedragon Wrote:
(03-13-2014, 11:10 PM)Kazinsal Wrote: We will not disable the plugin because of your petulant, pessimistic attitude.

If you do not like the changes you are free to not build bases.
..then diisable the plugin because it is not fair, at least it is very unfair against ALREADY EXISTING BASES

...ok, if someone owns an ALREADY EXISTING BASE then they are free to let it be DESTROYED very easy. They are free to look at MONTHS OF WORK going up in flames in less then 2 hrs.

(03-13-2014, 11:21 PM)Universal Exports Wrote: You might as well disable POBs entirely now. They're completely useless at this point.

I agree with Tel, so it's not just the ZA who thinks this is ********

I won't bother continuing to build my POB now, that's for sure.

Aside from change which always can be discussed and so far almost all changes got loud critique from somebody...

Is it me or your attitude is "if I can´t have base, nobody should be allowed to try to have it" ? Wow.


[Image: fFZqBwL.png][Image: 0xCVMYl.png][Image: 1MoJa5S.png]

<> Information <> Recruitment <> Wanderlust Magazine <>
Reply  
Offline spacedragon
03-13-2014, 11:38 PM,
#103
Member
Posts: 52
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2013

(03-13-2014, 11:32 PM)Lumik8 Wrote:
(03-13-2014, 09:37 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: Core 4 in 1 hour ? Just disable the plugin - this is a joke, to get to core 4 you need a few months, when 10 bs can take it out in 1 hour, did i mention time zones? what a joke

(03-13-2014, 11:19 PM)spacedragon Wrote:
(03-13-2014, 11:10 PM)Kazinsal Wrote: We will not disable the plugin because of your petulant, pessimistic attitude.

If you do not like the changes you are free to not build bases.
..then diisable the plugin because it is not fair, at least it is very unfair against ALREADY EXISTING BASES

...ok, if someone owns an ALREADY EXISTING BASE then they are free to let it be DESTROYED very easy. They are free to look at MONTHS OF WORK going up in flames in less then 2 hrs.

(03-13-2014, 11:21 PM)Universal Exports Wrote: You might as well disable POBs entirely now. They're completely useless at this point.

I agree with Tel, so it's not just the ZA who thinks this is ********

I won't bother continuing to build my POB now, that's for sure.

Aside from change which always can be discussed and so far almost all changes got loud critique from somebody...

Is it me or your attitude is "if I can´t have base, nobody should be allowed to try to have it" ? Wow.

... was NEVER my attidude!
Reply  
Offline HassLHoFF™
03-13-2014, 11:40 PM,
#104
Member
Posts: 1,064
Threads: 80
Joined: Jun 2012

Well I can understand Tel in some way. The SRP period for base upgrading is quite hard in my opinion. If someone sees his profession in this a regular SRP without a time period for upgrading makes more sense. The worst case scenario of this would be someone who just construct 10 core 1 bases just cause he has fun with it. I also suggest to rebalance the sieging side. Means that direct base sieging should just be allowed after a notification with an expiring time about 48h. After this time the base siege side has 48h time to destroy the base. The base the owner is just allowed to dock vessels with the official faction tag and/or a present RP that is in connection with the base. If he doens't comply, there won't be a time to expire, because instakill the base is allowed. If the siege is successful, well base went boom. If the siege wasn't successful, they'll have to wait '(maybe 2 weeks) to request a siege again.

[Image: xwkBvsU.png]
Information and Feedback - Recruitment


[Image: q5x9eiN.png]
Information - Feedback
Reply  
Offline Kosa
03-13-2014, 11:53 PM,
#105
Member
Posts: 378
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011

So how is the plugin now? Is it on? Is it disabled? I don't see any changes in the Reinforced Alloy needs.

[Image: unknown_alpha.png]
Reply  
Offline UK1
03-13-2014, 11:56 PM,
#106
Member
Posts: 296
Threads: 66
Joined: Sep 2007

Well people heres my opinion..

The mode team and absolutely nuts.
Making it so easy to destroy a core 4 base compaired to the time and effort it takes to build.
Your trying to promote the server and its new updates.
This is only gonna kill the server off.
On another note has anyone thought about the commodities/items that station factorys build?
Getting cloaks,jump drives ect is going to be very difficuilt or very expensive.
Prices are going to go through the roof.
Just like when you stopped making the barge accessable and it went to private sales.
Items are going to become rare or very hard to get.
In my opinion this is going to kill off the base building and put the final nails in the discovery 4.87 mod/server.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
03-14-2014, 12:14 AM,
#107
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

(03-13-2014, 11:23 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote: What is good about killing stations that people put a hard work on it in a matter of minutes, Is that a good thing?

Nah, it is definitely not as good as pulling up a base in a few hours while everybody sleeps and then set it to full hostile once it's indestructible.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
03-14-2014, 12:49 AM,
#108
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

few hours right.

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline spacedragon
03-14-2014, 12:51 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-14-2014, 01:27 AM by spacedragon.)
#109
Member
Posts: 52
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2013

....now I have been waiting about three and a half hours to get USEABLE ANSWERS to my questions in this post:

post 1

nothing.

Maybe ANOTHER DEVELOPER or ADMIN is able to answer.
"Kazinsal has already left the building!"

not that long (but also for hours) i am also waiting for a reaction of Kazinsal about my reply here:

post 2

At least 3 devs were "watching" this thread in this time and nobody is able to answer till now - I hardly can believe....

(03-13-2014, 10:18 PM)Kazinsal Wrote: Spacedragon, I will figure out what is with the repair functionality and get back to you.
...
When? - tomorrow? - next week? - in April? - next year?

If Kazinsal doesn't like to help, maybe SOME OTHER DEV/ADMIN can???
Reply  
Offline Lumik
03-14-2014, 01:21 AM,
#110
Member
Posts: 366
Threads: 23
Joined: Sep 2011

(03-13-2014, 11:56 PM)UK1 Wrote: Getting cloaks,jump drives ect is going to be very difficuilt or very expensive.
Prices are going to go through the roof. Items are going to become rare or very hard to get.
And this is in my opinion good because right now server is spammed with these things. For example cloaking device is now almost standard equipment of capital ships, at least from what I saw in Rheinland x Liberty battles in last months.

(03-13-2014, 11:56 PM)UK1 Wrote: In my opinion this is going to kill off the base building and put the final nails in the discovery 4.87 mod/server.

So we are finally at final nail again? Maybe you forget that this server is not "Discovery Player Owned Bases 4.87". Bases are fancy thing but should be just something additional. This server should be about RP and not about building, killing and supplying bases. It existed for years without bases, so I doubt it will die just because of lack of them or them being hardly sustainable and easy to kill.

This change may be cruel for those who already built their bases but those who will do it from now know the risk. If they choose building POB instead of playing the game some another way without them, they have to accept it.


[Image: fFZqBwL.png][Image: 0xCVMYl.png][Image: 1MoJa5S.png]

<> Information <> Recruitment <> Wanderlust Magazine <>
Reply  
Pages (18): « Previous 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 … 18 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode